Monero Faces Takeover Attempt by Qubic Mining Pool
- Qubic’s takeover attempt centralizes Monero’s hashrate, sparking opposition.
- Sergey Ivancheglo leads Qubic’s controversial move.
- Monero community takes actions to decentralize mining efforts.
Monero is currently experiencing an attempted network takeover by Qubic mining pool, led by Sergey Ivancheglo. This has centralized the hashrate, prompting Monero developers to act and significantly reduce Qubic’s mining dominance.
Hashrate centralization of Monero raises concerns about network security and economic attacks. It highlights vulnerabilities in decentralized frameworks.
The takeover attempt, led by Sergey Ivancheglo, threatens decentralized mining efforts and has prompted community backlash. Qubic controlled a large share of Monero’s hashrate until the plan was exposed. Sergey Ivancheglo, a known blockchain figure, founded Qubic and previously co-founded IOTA. Dan Dadybayo of Unstoppable Wallet has publicly analyzed these risks. Despite a substantial decrease in Qubic’s mining share, concerns remain over network security.
The attempted takeover has prompted a significant redistribution of Monero’s hashrate within mining pools after community efforts to regain decentralization. Financially, Qubic’s plan redirected XMR mining rewards into its ecosystem, affecting Monero’s economic structure.
“With 51% of the hashrate, Qubic can orphan blocks, reject transactions, delay confirmations, stifle competition, and force protocol changes… intent doesn’t matter. Centralization means risk, and potential censorship is destructive to the network.” — Dan Dadybayo, Analyst, Unstoppable Wallet
No direct statements have been issued by regulatory authorities such as the SEC or CFTC regarding this incident. However, the Monero development community is monitoring the situation closely for any future mitigation measures.
Looking forward, this incident may lead to increased scrutiny of centralization risks in cryptocurrency mining. Potential outcomes include strengthened decentralization mechanisms and protocol adjustments to prevent similar future incidents. Historically, the risk of large-scale mining pool centralization has prompted significant debate and action within the cryptocurrency industry.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Has Wall Street’s Magnificent 7 finally hit its breaking point?
Share link:In this post: Four of the Magnificent 7 are reporting earnings this week, raising fears about their outsized impact on Wall Street. The S&P 500 has surged 67% since 2023, mostly driven by a handful of large-cap tech stocks. The group accounted for 52% of last year’s total earnings growth, leaving the rest of the market behind.
Solana Treasury firm Upexi secures $500M to acquire more SOL
Share link:In this post: Solana treasury firm Upexi secures a $500M line of credit deal with A.G.P./Alliance Global Partners to fund the acquisition of more SOL. Upexi CEO Allan Marshall said the equity line gave his company additional means and flexibility to raise capital to boost its SOL position. Upexi’s shares (Nasdaq: UPXI) slightly increased from $6.11 to $6.49 on July 28, with a strong trading volume of roughly 3.24M shares.
Bernstein flags unique risks facing Ethereum treasuries
Share link:In this post: Bernstein noted that Ethereum treasuries face liquidity risks and smart contract vulnerabilities due to staking mechanisms. The firm argued that ETH’s yield generation comes with governance challenges in DAOs. The company believes ETH treasuries will hit $30-50M annual returns once scalability and legal frameworks mature.
Lido Founder Konstantin Lomashuk borrows 85M USDT from Aave for ETH acquisition
Share link:In this post: Konstantin Lomashuk, the Founder of Lido, received an 85M USDT loan from lending protocol Aave to purchase ETH. Lookonchain reported that Lomashuk first transferred 80M USDT to the Amber Group, which redirected all funds to an exchange and swapped them for over 15K ETH. A recent report by Lomashuk and Cyber.Fund’s Head of Research, Artem Kotelskiy, claimed that ETH was “ultrasound money.”
