MegaETH, a layer-2 blockchain platform built on Ethereum, has canceled its ambitious $1 billion campaign for its native stablecoin, USDm, following a series of technical complications that derailed the launch. The project, which promotes ultra-fast block processing and aims to match the performance of traditional web applications, was forced to halt deposits at $500 million and initiate refunds after encountering operational failures.
This abrupt decision has sparked concerns about MegaETH's internal controls and transparency. Observers have pointed out flaws in both the project's technical implementation and governance, raising doubts about its overall reliability.
MegaETH attributed the turmoil to poor execution and acknowledged that the process did not align with their original objectives. In a statement on X, the team confirmed they would no longer pursue the $1 billion cap and outlined a refund process, pending a smart contract audit. Plans are underway to launch a new USDC-USDm bridge before the Frontier mainnet beta, and depositors will be given the option to review and withdraw their funds if they choose.
The incident highlighted deeper issues within MegaETH's operational structure. Earlier, a misconfigured KYC system and rate-limiting problems prevented verified users from securing MEGA token allocations during an October auction, which still managed to raise $1.3 billion despite these setbacks. Analysis revealed disparities in deposit access: while 79 wallets contributed over $1 million each, 2,643 deposits were below $5,000, and 259 duplicate addresses suggested possible bot involvement or inflated participation figures.
AzFlin, a developer and DAO founder, criticized the team for avoidable mistakes, suggesting that greater diligence from engineers could have prevented these problems.
Despite the challenges, USDm remains a cornerstone of MegaETH's ecosystem, intended to lower transaction fees and support instant payments. The team plans to reopen the USDC-USDm bridge before the Frontier mainnet launch to boost liquidity and simplify onboarding. However, the recent difficulties have highlighted the dangers of rapid growth in decentralized finance, where technical errors can quickly undermine user trust and market stability.