BloodLoop 價格BLS

Why Will L1 Networks Boost Babylon? Babylon’s core idea is to provide Shared Security for new networks — known as BSNs — which leverage Babylon validators (Finality Providers) to secure and process transactions. However, like all restaking protocols, Babylon faces a key challenge: a limited number of clients. Currently, not many teams are building entirely new networks. On top of that, competition is intense, with not only @eigenlayer and @symbioticfi in the restaking space, but also proven L2 solutions like Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, and zkSync, which already offer robust stacks. As a result, growth in BSNs and BTC staking yield could otherwise remain slow. Babylon’s breakthrough solution is allowing existing L1 networks to integrate Shared Security. This gives them the highest level of security — anchored to the Bitcoin blockchain — without needing to reinvent infrastructure. This path is much faster and more scalable. Already, several major L1 networks have announced plans to join BSN, including: - Sui - Sei - TAC - Osmosis - Cosmos And this is just the beginning — many more L1s have signaled their intent to adopt BSN in the near future. How it works: Finality Providers will operate nodes for these L1s and validate transactions alongside their native validators. Using BLS signatures, the proofs are aggregated and recorded on the Bitcoin blockchain via Babylon’s Timestamping Protocol. For this service, L1 networks will pay BTC stakers directly, creating a new and potentially substantial revenue stream. As Babylon rolls out its full public BSN technology in Phase 3 (expected by end of 2025), yield for BTC stakers could rise significantly. Babylon is poised to surprise many. The Bitcoin ecosystem is only just beginning.

hmmm hmmm hmmm this reminds me a lot to ethervista @Ethereum_OS gib code bls so I can start my farmoooor job Always loved eth stuff cause at least it had some escence behind it, you had to work your ass off for it.. !pray

3/ How it works Union runs on ZK cryptography and BLS signatures for fast, verifiable cross-chain consensus. It’s also IBC-compatible - just faster, more flexible, and built for modern rollups.

老牌项目 @union_build 可能是web3跨链基础设施的一大幕后黑🐎！ unionlabs融资和背景不容忽视！ 在2023年当时首轮就完成了400w美元，2024年又整了1200万美元的A轮融资，有很多大机构大佬级别的参与：有longhash ventures，gumi cryptos capital， polygon celestia movement级别参与。项目玩的就是一个zk零知识证明，共识验证跨链协议。 项目优势很对用户胃口： union是面向未来的互操作协议，真的做到了无信任中介，无多签！ 1⃣️ cometbls：以bls签名和哈希设计实现验证者规模和安全网络 2⃣️galois：飞速生产链上zk证明状态 3⃣️voyager：保证数据传传递安全执行 项目支持很多环境：evm必须的，cosmos，ibc，solana ，altvm。可以做到无缝传递。很稳妥！ 怎么说呢，这个项目不是嘴炮不玩虚的概念，真实的解决链上无法信任沟通的问题，结合了 cosmos ibc和evm主网生态，也在布局btc l2和appchain，web3的下一阶段跨链基础设施最麻的一段，跨链眼下很多不稳定性，union可能会成就未来的跨链！ 持续关注og项目，一起gunion！！yyds！

The Fed prefers PCE as its inflation measure, and that's why it's often wrong 👇 The Personal Consumption Expenditures Index uses approximately 300 spending categories and is adjusted according to consumer behavior. The Index is divided into three subcategories: • Durable goods, Non-durable goods, and Services. However, there are several concerns associated with the PCE Price Index: • Too comprehensive: Overly comprehensive data mixes NGO and corporate spending with consumer spending. • Lag in Publication: The PCE is published with a lag, as it is updated monthly, offering a snapshot of inflation trends over the past month. • Need for revisions: Data is released late and sometimes inaccurately. • PCE uses the flawed Housing Prices data from the BLS. The government needs to improve its data system, and @truflation has the solutions.