TypeAI 價格TYPE

The type of excitement that the Pirate Nation can't build. $33 Million dollars raised and they are crying. You games just suck, you are lazy, and your tech is not that interesting get off the high horse. Axie #1

RT @Euler__Lagrange: Today was one of the craziest days. Im in a movie rn type shit. Like the last 2 years has been a sequence of events…

5G is the last actual hold up of the globalist plan. You cannot implement the type of social controls they want without it. Everyone will be chipped and part of the IOT. This will be how they exert their social credit control. Once it is fully rolled out, the floodgates will open

Today in Iceland we had a session with the one & only Vitalik Buterin! Doing things remote is always much harder than IRL - both in the technical setup which was smooth thanks to @Shakaleikaumaka & also the moderation Rather than open it up for participants to ask Qs directly, we went around the room for feedback on projects each participant was working on We started with data analysis on some of the deep funding data, where we found the need to normalise jury data so that even if an overexcited evaluator gives higher marks to all repos it's the same impact as a conservative one giving low grades to all We chatted briefly about the deep funding approach and it's applicability to OSS licensing, where a repo can be restricted use for those not channeling revenue back to them but more permissive for those who fund their dependencies We then moved on to QF, where Vitalik identified a neat issue that needs work: a mathematical proof for connection oriented cluster matching (or correlation discounting) which is currently missing We also dug deep into the QF formula itself, questioning the axiom of equal marginal utility for all participants. After all, some have more money than others so $1 for you might be more expensive than for me After that we broadened the scope a bit to explore how the lean programming language is changing math collaboration, since proofs can be auto verified. He was particularly keen on applying that to zkevm formal verification work This segued into a discussion around funding loops for Ethereum itself, where block rewards or issuance can be used for more than just chain security. Condorcet voting as a consensus mechanism was discussed as a method for participants to vote for allocating to splittor contracts dividing the funds without it leading to self enrichment behavior that we saw in eos. He also felt it's easier for new chains to experiment with network fees to go into funding ecosystem growth than older and more established chains We then moved on to a more urgent priority: whether improving UX is only the protocol layer or also applies to apps Vitalik had the counterintuitive take here that UX is to be seen holistically as encompassing both security & privacy, not just usability Finally, we spoke about the sustainability of popups themselves. While some are targeted corporate type retreats, other community oriented ones need either a permanent location or a VC type setup where projects born from it give a share to the popup enabling their formation Which is all a way to say, if we launch impact evaluator token economies from this retreat they should allocate to the research retreat itself for its continuation! Our current experiment here is creating a hypercert of our residency so that if it is fully bought out we can host another version of it. And even if it's not bought, all costs are made transparent in the cert so it's still a victory!

RT @kendallhosseini: an evil billionaire is such an interesting role to get type cast as but jeremy strong always finds a way