- Cardano founder demands evidence after accusations about project transparency.
- Community member cites blockchain analysis of unclaimed UTXOs in the Cardano network.
- Optim Finance prepares a statement admitting mistakes while defending its position.
Charles Hoskinson has directly challenged critics to provide “credible evidence” to support accusations against Cardano and its founding entities. The Cardano founder’s response came during an escalating dispute on X about transparency and accountability within the project.
“Again you are gaslighting. What credible evidence has been presented?” Hoskinson wrote. He pushed back against claims that have circulated within the cryptocurrency community. His demand for evidence follows mounting pressure from various parties questioning aspects of Cardano’s operations.
The exchange intensified after Hoskinson criticized what he called a “slander cabal” that has spent months attacking Cardano and its core entities. He questioned the motivations of those making accusations and wondered about potential consequences when their claims are investigated.
Community Member Presents Blockchain Analysis
An X user responded to Hoskinson’s evidence request by referencing blockchain analysis conducted by researcher Masato Alexander. The analysis focuses on identifying unclaimed UTXOs (Unspent Transaction Outputs) within the Cardano network.
The community member clarified their position and stated they don’t believe Hoskinson or Input Output Global stole funds. However, they acknowledged that a broader understanding of certain transactions only came to light through the researcher’s work.
Related: Hoskinson Hits ETH As His ADA Leads In Core Development Metrics
“I don’t think you (or IOG or whoever) stole the $600M. But if we’re being intellectually honest, I don’t think there was a broad understanding of what happened until he brought it up,” the user explained.
Optim Finance Responds to Criticism
Despite having no personal concerns about how voucher ADA was handled, the community member expressed appreciation for using blockchain transparency to hold founding entities accountable. Meanwhile, Optim Finance has announced that they are preparing a formal statement addressing the controversy. Their preliminary response acknowledges making mistakes while outlining their future approach.
“We will – admit we made a mistake – do better,” Optim Finance stated. “We won’t – cry on X – threaten to sue people – bring more ‘weak boy energy’ in the words of the great Berry Ales in observing recent behaviors.”
This response suggests Optim Finance is taking a conciliatory approach while maintaining its position on the underlying issues. Their reference to avoiding “weak boy energy” appears to be a veiled criticism of how others have handled the dispute.
Hoskinson Backs Aligned Projects
Earlier, Hoskinson had expressed willingness to work with competitors, stating “Any optim competitor is a friend of mine” and indicating his support for projects building on Cardano . He also mentioned voting with his “feet and wallet” for projects and founders who share his values.
The dispute highlights ongoing tensions within the Cardano ecosystem about transparency expectations and accountability standards. While blockchain technology provides visibility into transactions, interpreting and understanding that data still remains hard.
Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.
