Bitget App
Trade smarter
Open
HomepageSign up
Bitget>
News>
Markets>
Tech Giants Dominate S&P 500, Raising Risk Alerts

Tech Giants Dominate S&P 500, Raising Risk Alerts

Cointribune2025/10/21 10:45
By: Cointribune
P+10.92%GROK0.00%
Summarize this article with:
ChatGPT Perplexity Grok

Valuations of artificial intelligence are soaring, sometimes without profitability to support them. Voices are rising, recalling the excesses of the 2000 Internet bubble. Disproportionate weight of sector giants in indices, massive investments, widespread enthusiasm: signs of a possible overheating are accumulating. In this climate of euphoria, a question reemerges : is AI the engine of a new economic era or that of a speculative bubble ready to burst ?

Tech Giants Dominate S&P 500, Raising Risk Alerts image 0 Tech Giants Dominate S&P 500, Raising Risk Alerts image 1

In brief

  • Valuations in the artificial intelligence sector are reaching record levels, despite the lack of profitability for the majority of companies.
  • Institutions like the IMF, the Bank of England, and JPMorgan warn of a possible rush comparable to the 2000 Internet bubble.
  • Alarming market ratios, extreme concentration in indices, and the massive arrival of individual investors increase concerns.
  • Colossal investments in AI infrastructure raise fears of overcapacity, while concrete economic returns remain limited.

Giants valued at a loss

At the end of August, Sam Altman, founder of OpenAI, expressed his own doubts about the frenzy surrounding artificial intelligence and promised a more human AI . “Are we in a phase where investors overall are overexcited about artificial intelligence? I think so,” he declared .

A few weeks later, his startup, still not publicly listed and unprofitable, was valued at $500 billion, an unprecedented level for a company of this profile. This stratospheric valuation is not an isolated case. Tech giants Apple, Nvidia, Microsoft, Alphabet, and Amazon now concentrate nearly 30 % of the total S&P 500 capitalization, a historic weight in the markets.

In this context, the International Monetary Fund, the Bank of England, and several major banks publicly question a possible overheating comparable to that observed in the late 1990s.

Market indicators reveal several objective signs of euphoria, according to consistent analyses :

  • The S&P 500 price/earnings ratio is now 23, a level close to the peak of 25 reached just before the bursting of the Internet bubble in 2000 ;
  • The total equity value of American companies represents 363 % of nominal GDP in the second quarter of this year, an all-time record, significantly higher than the 212 % peak in the first quarter of 2000 ;
  • The IMF warns that a “disappointment caused by AI results” could lead to a sharp market revaluation of tech stocks.

Through these on-chain data, it is the growing disconnect between market capitalization and real profitability that worries. While AI promises significant productivity gains, its concrete effects on profits remain largely speculative for the time being.

The explosion of expenses and the concentration of technological power

Beyond disconnected valuations, it is now the sector’s internal dynamics that fuel concerns. According to the Gartner firm, global investments in AI infrastructure are expected to reach $1.5 trillion this year , mainly directed towards data centers and computer hardware in the United States.

This investment volume recalls that of the 2000s in fiber optics and telecommunications. However, the lack of profitability triggers distrust : “80% of companies in the AI field are not profitable,” observes Alexandre Baradez, analyst at IG.

Added to this is another phenomenon: the circularity of agreements between major players. In one month, OpenAI signed a $100 billion deal with Nvidia , then announced the purchase of equipment worth several billion from AMD, before considering a partnership with Broadcom. These cross operations, considered by some as “incestuous,” evoke speculative mechanisms observed during the Dotcom bubble.

The very structure of the market has evolved, with a record involvement of individual investors. More than 35% of American shares are now held by individual investors, a figure much higher than that observed in 2000.

These data translate a potential overestimation of growth prospects, at a time when the IMF anticipates only 2 % growth for the United States in 2026. Furthermore, a “strong acceleration of earnings per share seems unlikely,” according to a note from the Swiss private bank J. Safra Sarasin.

While the analogy with the Internet bubble cannot be mechanically established, current leaders such as Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, or Nvidia, whose capitalization reaches $4.68 trillion, driven by AI demand , are largely capitalized and much stronger than the precarious startups of 2000, the scenario of a sharp revaluation remains credible. In sum, the question is whether its current valuation rests on sufficiently solid foundations to avoid a collapse.

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
PoolX: Earn new token airdrops
Lock your assets and earn 10%+ APR
Lock now!

You may also like

ENSO Price Plummets by 502.51% Within 24 Hours as Prolonged Downtrend Continues

- ENSO plunged 502.51% in 24 hours, with 2129.1% 7-day and 5190.84% monthly declines, reflecting extreme volatility. - Prolonged selloff highlights market uncertainty, lack of stabilizing news, and fragile price structure without support levels. - Technical indicators confirm deep sell-off across all timeframes, with analysts warning of further pressure without a catalyst. - Asset remains in technical bear phase driven by profit-taking and algorithmic pressure, with over 90% YTD value loss.

Bitget-RWA2025/10/22 17:02
Bitcoin News Today: Bears Caution About a Potential 50% Drop in Bitcoin While Bulls Anticipate a Surge to $250K

- Bitcoin faces "broadening top" warning from Peter Brandt, citing 1977 soybean crash parallels and potential 50% price drop. - MSTR's 10.13% stock decline highlights institutional risks as Bitcoin's 30-day price falls 5.32% amid supply-demand imbalances. - Traditional 4-year Bitcoin cycles break post-2024 halving, with analysts predicting 30-50% corrections instead of historical 70-80% crashes. - Market fear index hits 25 as bulls target $185K-$250K levels, while bears warn of prolonged downturns and Bitc

Bitget-RWA2025/10/22 16:08

Trending news

More
1
The 20,000+ Miner Foundation: How BlockDAG Is Building a Real Network, Not Just Hype
2
ENSO Price Plummets by 502.51% Within 24 Hours as Prolonged Downtrend Continues

Crypto prices

More
Bitcoin
Bitcoin
BTC
$108,093.49
-3.48%
Ethereum
Ethereum
ETH
$3,828.05
-3.68%
Tether USDt
Tether USDt
USDT
$1
-0.04%
BNB
BNB
BNB
$1,074.57
-0.97%
XRP
XRP
XRP
$2.39
-3.69%
Solana
Solana
SOL
$183.34
-5.11%
USDC
USDC
USDC
$0.9999
+0.00%
TRON
TRON
TRX
$0.3213
-0.89%
Dogecoin
Dogecoin
DOGE
$0.1916
-4.32%
Cardano
Cardano
ADA
$0.6326
-5.27%
How to buy BTC
Bitget lists BTC – Buy or sell BTC quickly on Bitget!
Trade now
Become a trader now?A welcome pack worth 6200 USDT for new users!
Sign up now
Trade smarter