Prezzo di XX

2013 You missed $BTC 2014 You missed $DOGE 2015-You missed $XRP 2016-You missed $ETH 2017 - You missed $ADA 2018 - You missed $BNB 2019 - You missed $LINK 2020 - You missed $DOT 2021 - You missed $SHIB In 2023, You miss $...??? In 2024, You miss $.......??? In 2025 You Don't want miss.....? mm For what Coin upcoming 2025 ???? #1000x gem comment Your 2025 upcoming Coin

The cryptocurrency market may be primed for a significant shift as altcoin season shows signs of an imminent comeback. According to Crypto Rover, a prominent analyst, the current wave of panic selling is likely a final shakeout before a major altcoin surge. This perspective is further supported by shifting investor sentiment and historical data, which indicate that a resurgence in altcoins frequently follows periods of pronounced Bitcoin dominance alongside market uncertainty. As capital begins to rotate from Bitcoin into altcoins, the stage appears set for select cryptocurrencies to deliver substantial returns, possibly even 10x gains. Bitcoin commands a 62.6% share of the market, firmly establishing this period as “Bitcoin Season.” The Altcoin Season Index sits at 22, far below the 75-point mark that typically signals altcoin outperformance. Historically, similar dips in the index have preceded sharp rebounds in altcoin valuations. Besides, Bitcoin’s price remains relatively stable at $102,940.52, down slightly by 0.72%, reflecting a cautious but resilient investor mood. Meanwhile, Ethereum has dropped 4.88%, landing at $2,482.44, with other major altcoins like BNB, Solana, and XRP also registering small declines. These movements indicate consolidation, often a precursor to breakout patterns. Related: Altcoin Season Delayed as Bitcoin Dominance Holds at 61.7% Adding another layer to this market assessment, the Fear and Greed Index currently stands at 68. This is generally viewed as an optimistic reading, reflecting robust underlying investor appetite even in the face of short-term volatility, further supporting the idea of keeping a close eye on altcoins. Institutional interest is gaining traction, as evidenced by a $282.4 million positive net flow into crypto ETFs. This surge suggests growing confidence among large investors. Notably, the ETF inflows peaked around late April and early May, pointing to strategic capital allocation rather than speculative fervor. Related: BTC Dominance Is Key If Bitcoin Hits $109K For Altcoin Season Clues The derivatives market also remains active, with perpetual contracts reaching $691.27 billion and futures at $3.94 billion. This high engagement signals that traders are positioning for significant moves ahead, possibly anticipating a major altcoin breakout. Volatility data offers another key insight. Bitcoin’s implied volatility stands at 44.48, while Ethereum’s sits higher at 71.78. This contrast suggests traders expect sharper price movements in altcoins compared to Bitcoin. Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

Michaël van de Poppe, a well-known cryptocurrency analyst, shared a bullish outlook on Ethereum (ETH) in a post on X dated May 17, 2025. He claimed that any ETH price under $2,400 is a “steal” following the recent surge, suggesting Ethereum could continue its upward trajectory. His post included a chart showing Ethereum’s sharp rebound after bottoming out below $2,000 earlier. The TradingView chart shared by Van de Poppe illustrates Ethereum’s price action against Tether (USDT) on the Binance exchange. It shows ETH rallied sharply in early May 2025 after a prolonged downtrend. The chart marks a clear high timeframe support zone for ETH near $2,100 and a resistance area identified between roughly $2,600 and $2,800, with Van de Poppe specifically noting $2,750 as a resistance point. Van de Poppe labels the $2,400 level as a “significant opportunity,” implying that current prices still offer value before potential continuation of the uptrend. His projection indicates a possible consolidation near resistance, followed by further upside. Van de Poppe’s analysis aligns with growing optimism across the crypto market. Ethereum’s current structure suggests that traders could monitor the $2,100 to $2,400 range for signs of support and accumulation. The chart implies a bullish setup, where a confirmed breakout above the resistance zone may lead to further gains. The directional arrow on the chart points toward new highs, though no exact timeframe is provided. Meanwhile, Ethereum’s Relative Strength Index (RSI) has climbed to 52.49, breaking above the neutral 50 mark for the first time since March 2025. The moving average of the RSI currently stands at 38.40, reflecting earlier weakness. This upward move indicates increasing buying momentum. The RSI measures the speed and strength of price changes on a scale from 0 to 100. Levels above 70 are considered overbought, while those below 30 suggest oversold conditions. A position above 50 typically signals bullish pressure. Ethereum’s RSI stayed below 50 throughout recent months, reflecting seller control. The current breakout shifts this dynamic. The last meaningful upside occurred in early 2024, when RSI briefly surged to 85 before reversing. The present rise shows a renewed trend shift without extreme conditions. Unlike earlier failed attempts, this move has also cleared its moving average. The RSI’s advance above both its average and the midpoint level signals a potential trend reversal. It highlights a growing change in sentiment. This may support further gains if broader market conditions align. With RSI direction turning upward, traders now have an early signal to monitor price continuation, especially if volume confirms the momentum. Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

Ethereum community researcher, Justin Drake, suggests that executing a 51% attack on the Bitcoin network is much easier and less costly than attempting a similar attack on Ethereum. Drake explains that although a 51% attack on Bitcoin would be very expensive, estimated at around $10 billion, it is still possible. In contrast, he argues Ethereum would be much harder and more expensive because of its Proof-of-Stake (PoS) security. Drake, a key figure in the Ethereum Merge that transitioned the network to PoS, shared his views in an interview with Cointelegraph . His remarks align with a May 14 X post by Grant Hummer, co-founder of Ethereum-focused company Etherealize, who estimated the cost of a Bitcoin 51% attack at around $8 billion. Hummer further suggested that if this cost drops to $2 billion, a successful attack on Bitcoin is almost inevitable. Hummer also highlights that the most critical issue for Bitcoin is its “security budget,” which he believes matters more as the mining rewards for maintaining the Bitcoin network are lessened. With a lowering of these rewards, he suggests it becomes simpler for a single entity to dominate the network, a situation that threatens its decentralized system. In contrast to Bitcoin, Drake highlights why an attack on the Ethereum chain is expensive due to its PoS design, which requires controlling at least half of the network to have an effect. Currently, there are over 34 million ETH, equivalent to approximately $89.6 billion, being staked across the Ethereum network. Even before considering the effect on the market obtaining 51% of ETH would require paying approximately $44.8 billion. Related: BFT Attacks on Bitcoin and Ethereum No Longer Economically Feasible: Research In addition, the cost of attacking Ethereum is enhanced by its current market cap of around $316 billion and a 24-hour trading volume of roughly $25 billion. Based on this an attacker would have to control approximately 14.2% of the market and 180% of the daily trading volume to cause the price of ETH to jump and increase the attack’s cost. Drake also highlighted Ethereum’s “social layer” as a unique defense mechanism against 51% attacks. This aspect of Ethereum’s security relies on the collective action of the network’s community which can identify and penalize malicious actors through social slashing, a process unavailable in Bitcoin’s proof-of-work (PoW) framework. Experts in the industry have expressed mixed opinions regarding the viability of such attacks. According to Matan Sitbon, the CEO of Lightblocks, even though Ethereum is secure through cryptography, it truly relies on the support provided by the community. Meanwhile, Pavel Yashin stated, if the network is detected to be centralized, Ethereum can deal with the threat by forking the network, effectively isolating compromised chains. Related: The $3.2 Billion Aftermath: How Options Expiry Shook Up BTC, ETH Crypto Prices Hassan Khan, CEO of Ordeez, a Bitcoin liquidity protocol, admitted to the theoretical risk but stated that the high amount of energy needed makes a sustained 51% attack on Bitcoin unlikely, despite its higher theoretical vulnerability. Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

The legal entanglement between Ripple and the U.S. SEC took a new turn after Judge Analisa Torres denied a joint motion to modify the final judgment. This has raised serious questions about the future of their settlement. Meanwhile, Australian lawyer Bill Morgan has outlined six critical legal issues facing both parties. Notably, on May 8, Ripple and the SEC jointly filed a motion seeking to amend key terms of a previously agreed-upon settlement. This included lifting a permanent injunction on Ripple’s institutional XRP sales and reducing a $125 million civil penalty to $50 million. However, Judge Torres dismissed the motion on May 15, stating it failed to meet procedural standards under Rule 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which governs relief from final judgments. The motion had instead relied on Rule 62.1, which allows a judge to issue an indicative ruling when a case is under appeal. Judge Torres made it clear that the motion would still be denied even if jurisdiction were restored from the appellate court. Related: XRP Case Setback: Ripple-SEC Joint Motion Fails to Clear Court’s Procedural Bar Reacting to the development, attorney Morgan posted a detailed legal analysis on X. He identified six unanswered questions that now cloud the path forward for Ripple and the SEC. His reflections center on the validity of the settlement, procedural compliance, and the SEC’s internal governance. Among the most pressing concerns: Morgan suggests it’s “hard to believe” that experienced legal teams from both Ripple and the SEC would overlook such a critical procedural rule. This implies the use of Rule 62.1 may have been a calculated move to bypass the difficulty of proving “exceptional circumstances” under Rule 60. The failure of the joint motion means the $125 million penalty remains in place, and the ban on institutional XRP sales still stands, at least for now. Related: Ripple Can Now Access $400 Billion UAE Trade Zone With New DFSA Payment License Meanwhile, Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer, Stuart Alderoty, clarified that Judge Torres’ denial is procedural and does not affect Ripple’s prior legal victories, including the July 2023 ruling that XRP is not a security. He emphasized that Ripple and the SEC remain aligned in seeking resolution and plan to refile under the appropriate legal framework. Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.