QuickSwap [Old]の‌価格QUICK

I remember when @a16z claimed software is eating the world. Now AI and LLM UI is eating the world. It's insanely seamless to interact with distributed systems through natural language. Just tested @satosh_ai_agent with a quick trade of $stx to $droid and it was magical.

RT @TheMoonCarl: Don't sell your #Bitcoin to institutions for quick profits. This is a long term game to $1,000,000!

$MAVIA This analysis will explore potential market impacts, historical patterns, and planning. Step 1: Data Compilation $ENA : 172 million tokens unlock at 3:00 PM Beijing Time (BJT) on August 5th, 2.70% of circulating supply, valued at ~$95.8 million or up to $107.05 million with a market cap of $3.75–$8.84 billion. $IMX 24.52 million tokens at 8:00 AM BJT on August 8th, 1.30% of supply, valued at ~$12.2–$13.63 million, market cap ~$991 million. $MOVE : 50 million tokens at 8:00 PM BJT on August 9th, 1.89% of supply, valued at ~$6.5–$6.53 million, market cap ~$1.29 billion. SPEC: 3.62 million tokens at 8:00 AM BJT on August 5th, 17.7% of supply, valued at ~$1.9 million (web), market cap not specified. EIGEN: 1.29 million tokens at 3:00 AM BJT on August 6th, 0.40% of supply, valued at ~$1.4 million, market cap not specified. $RENDER 492,000 tokens at 8:00 AM BJT on August 10th, 0.09% of supply, valued at ~$1.7 million, market cap not specified. MAVIA: 11.89 million tokens at 8:00 AM BJT on August 6th, 23.03% of supply, valued at ~$1.9 million, market cap not specified. Total Unlock Value: Estimates range from $120 million to $535.65 million across all projects . Step 2: Market Impact Assessment Supply Shock: Large unlocks (e.g., MAVIA’s 23.03%, SPEC’s 17.7%) could lead to significant selling pressure if holders liquidate. Smaller unlocks (e.g., RENDER’s 0.09%, EIGEN’s 0.40%) are less likely to cause immediate disruption but may contribute to cumulative effects. Historical Patterns: Web data indicates past unlocks (e.g., May 2025 ENA unlock) caused short-term volatility but stabilized quickly due to demand absorption and staking incentives. ENA’s recent 10% price jump despite a $101.87 million unlock on August 5th suggests strong market resilience or buying pressure. Liquidity and Volatility: The total unlock value ($120M–$535M) represents a notable influx, potentially amplifying volatility, especially with a reported 2.73% crypto market cap drop (web). ENA’s $1.01 billion trading volume and IMX’s high circulation (95.1%) indicate robust liquidity, which may mitigate severe drops. Sentiment and Fundamentals: Web sources highlight institutional interest in ENA (e.g., USDe growth to $9.3 billion) and IMX’s gaming sector role, suggesting long-term demand could offset short-term sell-offs. However, Aave’s $4.7 billion exposure to ENA’s USDe raises systemic risk concerns. Step 3: Collapse Scenario Analysis Triggers: A "collapse" could occur if unlocks coincide with mass selling, low demand, or a broader market downturn. ENA’s $95.8M unlock today (August 5th) and IMX’s $12.2M on August 8th are critical dates to watch, especially if exchange inflows spike (e.g., ENA’s 250M tokens moved to exchanges recently). Mitigating Factors: Staking, governance use (e.g., IMX’s 16.56M for development), and institutional absorption could dampen sell pressure. ENA’s double-bottom pattern and USDe growth suggest bullish undercurrents. Risk Levels: MAVIA (23.03%) and SPEC (17.7%) face the highest risk of price drops due to high unlock percentages, while ENA and IMX’s larger market caps may absorb shocks better. Step 4: Planning Recommendations Diversification: Reduce exposure to high-unlock tokens (MAVIA, SPEC) and balance with lower-risk assets. Timing: Consider selling or hedging before key unlocks (e.g., August 5th for ENA, August 8th for IMX) if bearish signals emerge, or wait for post-unlock stabilization (historical trend). Monitoring: Track real-time on-chain data (e.g., exchange inflows, staking rates) and market sentiment. A DeepSearch update could provide current price reactions. Strategy: Use stop-losses or options to protect against volatility. If anticipating a dip, buy during stabilization; if bullish, accumulate post-unlock if demand holds. Conclusion The unlocks pose a moderate risk of short-term "collapse" (price drops), particularly for MAVIA and SPEC, but ENA and IMX’s fundamentals and liquidity suggest resilience. Historical data supports quick stabilization, though systemic risks (e.g., Aave exposure) warrant cautio$MOVE

NEW DASHBOARD: We are now tracking @DriftProtocol, Solana's largest perps exchange. Built by @0xSharples, we cover Drift's financials, volume, and activity broken down by the market and token traded. Here is a quick look at the latest dashboard

7/ A quick note: There’s no guarantee a Breakaway Gap will stay open forever. Some may eventually get filled. But if it stays open long enough it often becomes a high-conviction setup zone.