AC Milan Fan Token 價格ACM

RT @zerokn0wledge_: Attention Capital Markets (ACM) & Almanak Sale 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺: 𝗜𝗻𝗳𝗼𝗙𝗶 𝗶𝘀 𝗕𝗿𝗼𝗸𝗲𝗻 Current "InfoFi" often rewards low quali…

We're in an InfoFi x TGE season. @cookiedotfun → @Almanak__. @KaitoAI → @TheoriqAI and @EspressoSys Here's everything you need to know about Almanak's ACM. While InfoFi campaigns were built to reward visibility, in practice, they rewarded volume regardless of intent. • AI-generated threads dominated timelines. • Token allocations flowed to large accounts, not active users. • Airdrop recipients sold on unlock, often having never used the product. The mechanism was frictionless... too frictionless. No stake, no skin, no signal. ACM introduces a constraint: attention must be paired with capital to matter. SNAPS and cSNAPS ACM tracks participation in two layers: • SNAPS reward posts. • cSNAPS reward posts plus usage or capital commitment. Tweeting gets you in the game. But investing or interacting moves you up the board and when rewards are distributed: • 80% goes to the cSNAPS leaderboard • 20% to the SNAPS leaderboard This filters out passive farming and favors users with skin in the game those willing to bet, not just talk. How is this Different from Kaito? Kaito’s Espresso raise was highly criticised for delayed liquidity: • $400M FDV • 0% at TGE • 12-month cliff + 12-month vesting Even for believers, the breakeven math looked bleak. @Almanak__ skips that entirely: • 100% unlocked at TGE • No cliff • Lower FDV for top participants Other recent launches (e.g., EigenLayer ) leaned on lockups, long vesting, or whitelists shaped by follower count but ACM proposes something different: • CT clout won’t cut it. • Being early won’t either. • Show up, show work, show skin. The behavioral logic underneath Two effects explain why ACM might produce better outcomes: • Endowment Effect: people value tokens more when they’ve paid for them. • Loss Aversion: when you have real money at stake, you think twice before dumping. While InfoFi didn’t trigger either, ACM forces both into the design. This doesn't guarantee success, but it reduces the mismatch between who promotes and who stays. The Bigger Shift Token sales don’t just raise funds, they reveal how a project thinks. Almanak’s decision to launch via ACM suggests it wants a cap table that mirrors usage. Almanak isn’t just testing a new fundraising model. It’s testing whether launches can be designed to filter for conviction not just capture attention. No format is perfect. But ACM makes one thing clear: If you’re going to post, you should know what you’re backing and if you’re going to back something, it should be visible on-chain. That feedback loop; between usage, capital, and visibility is what InfoFi lacked. Whether ACM scales or not, it raises the bar for what a “community raise” actually means. The blueprint is different and for now, that's the more interesting signal.

Top takeaways from the conversation: → Capital can't be gamed → Fronting capital = proof-of-belief → The ACM structure works against farmers → InfoFi manipulation becomes costly under ACM → Extraction behaviour dies when participation costs something → ACM reveals who

Everyone has opinions. ACM demands the receipts. Ahead of the ACM launch, @fwielanier sat with @xkonjin (founder @tickernomicstv) and @d0itdifferent (co-founder @legiondotcc) to dig into the WHY behind Cookie X Legion and what ACM solves. Dive in:

Attention Capital Markets (ACM) & Almanak Sale 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺: 𝗜𝗻𝗳𝗼𝗙𝗶 𝗶𝘀 𝗕𝗿𝗼𝗸𝗲𝗻 Current "InfoFi" often rewards low quality engagement farming, not genuine conviction. This leads to: - Low-quality spam and AI slop content. - Token dumps at TGE as farmers with no "skin in the game" sell off. - Genuine, smaller users, investors and believers are being drowned out by large accounts farming rewards. - Psychologically, there's no endowment effect (valuing what you own) or loss aversion, as farmers invest no capital. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝗼𝗹𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻: 𝗔𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗖𝗮𝗽𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗹 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗲𝘁𝘀 (𝗔𝗖𝗠) ACM, powered by @cookiedotfun, is a new framework designed to fix InfoFi by linking social media attention directly to onchain capital commitment. The core idea is Attention + Capital = Conviction. ACM introduces a dual-point system: ➤ SNAPS: Standard points earned for posting about a project on X (formerly Twitter). ➤ cSNAPS (Conviction SNAPS): Your SNAPS score boosted by your capital commitment. This "conviction" is measured by: - Investing in the project's previous rounds (e.g., on the Legion launchpad). - Staking $COOKIE tokens (for Diamond stakers). - Using the project's dApp or contributing to its vault (onchain activity). 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗠𝗲𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗰𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗼 𝗪𝗶𝗻 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗔𝗖𝗠 ➤ Snap to Invest (Pre-TGE Access): By earning SNAPS and cSNAPS, you can qualify for preferential investment terms in a project's sale. This rewards early, vocal supporters with a discounted entry. ➤ Invest/Stake to Snap (Bigger Airdrops): After the sale, the project's airdrop is distributed based on the two leaderboards, but with a heavy bias towards capital-backed conviction. - 80% of the airdrop reward pool goes to the cSNAPS leaderboard. - 20% of the airdrop reward pool goes to the regular SNAPS leaderboard. This model ensures that those who invest, stake, and use the project (true believers) receive the vast majority of the rewards, aligning incentives for long-term success, and spinning a powerful flywheel. 𝗙𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝗔𝗖𝗠 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁: 𝗔𝗹𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗸 𝗦𝗮𝗹𝗲 𝗗𝗲𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗹𝘀 @Almanak__ is a platform for building, optimizing, and managing code-based financial strategies with AI agents in a no-code environment. A.k.a. an "AI x DeFi x vibecoding" platform for institutional-grade financial strategies. - Sale Date: August 21, 2025. - Standard Terms: $90mm FDV, 100% unlock at TGE - Preferential Terms: $75mm FDV for top supporters How to Qualify for Preferential Terms: - Be in the Top 50 on the cSNAPS leaderboard. - Be in the Top 25 on the SNAPS leaderboard. Will you be snapping about Almanak anon?