Bitget App
交易「智」變
DOLA Borrowing Right 價格

DOLA Borrowing Right 價格DBR

未上架
NT$2.68TWD
-3.50%1D
截至今日 10:07(UTC),DOLA Borrowing Right(DBR)的 新台幣 價格為 NT$2.68 TWD。
數據來源於第三方提供商。本頁面和提供的資訊不為任何特定的加密貨幣提供背書。想要交易已上架幣種?  點擊此處
註冊
價格圖表
DOLA Borrowing Right價格走勢圖 (TWD/DBR)
最近更新時間 2025-07-31 10:07:50(UTC+0)

今日DOLA Borrowing Right即時價格TWD

今日DOLA Borrowing Right即時價格為 NT$2.68 TWD,目前市值為 NT$0.00。過去 24 小時內,DOLA Borrowing Right價格跌幅為 3.50%,24 小時交易量為 NT$1.55M。DBR/TWD(DOLA Borrowing Right兌換TWD)兌換率即時更新。
1DOLA Borrowing Right的新台幣價值是多少?
截至目前,DOLA Borrowing Right(DBR)的 新台幣 價格為 NT$2.68 TWD。您現在可以用 1 DBR 兌換 NT$2.68,或用 NT$ 10 兌換 3.73 DBR。在過去 24 小時內,DBR 兌換 TWD 的最高價格為 NT$2.15 TWD,DBR 兌換 TWD 的最低價格為 NT$2.06 TWD。

您認為今天 DOLA Borrowing Right 價格會上漲還是下跌?

總票數:
上漲
0
下跌
0
投票數據每 24 小時更新一次。它反映了社群對 DOLA Borrowing Right 的價格趨勢預測,不應被視為投資建議。

DOLA Borrowing Right 市場資訊

價格表現(24 小時)
24 小時
24 小時最低價 NT$2.0624 小時最高價 NT$2.15
歷史最高價:
NT$6.41
漲跌幅(24 小時):
-3.50%
漲跌幅(7 日):
-0.57%
漲跌幅(1 年):
-7.45%
市值排名:
#4533
市值:
--
完全稀釋市值:
--
24 小時交易額:
NT$1,554,159.1
流通量:
-- DBR
‌最大發行量:
4.65M DBR

DOLA Borrowing Right (DBR) 簡介

關於DOLA借貸權代幣的詳解

隨著區塊鏈技術的發展,加密貨幣已經從早期的默默無名發展為全球最具影響力的金融工具之一。其中,DOLA借貸權代幣是其中一個重要的產品。

DOLA借貸權代幣的功能

DOLA借貸權代幣具有多種功能,主要是為用戶提供在區塊鏈大廳承認協議之一的多個金融服務。使用者可以藉由保證品來擔保並借款,從而進行不同的交易。

借貸權代幣

DOLA借貸權代幣通過自身特性使加密貨幣資產融資變得更加容易。用戶可以擔保其加密貨幣,並獲得相應數量的DOLA代幣作為借款,從而在不需要出售原有加密貨幣資產的前提下,進行多種金融操作。

綜上所述,DOLA借貸權代幣作為一種加密貨幣產品,已經在當前金融體系中扮演了重要的角色。透過獨特的借款機制,DOLA借貸權代幣讓用戶能更好地利用他們的加密貨幣資產,進行更豐富和全面的金融活動。

DOLA Borrowing Right 的 AI 分析報告

今日加密市場熱點查看報告

DOLA Borrowing Right價格歷史(TWD)

過去一年,DOLA Borrowing Right價格上漲了 -7.45%。在此期間,兌TWD 的最高價格為 NT$6.41,兌TWD 的最低價格為 NT$1.25。
時間漲跌幅(%)漲跌幅(%)最低價相應時間內 {0} 的最低價。最高價 最高價
24h-3.50%NT$2.06NT$2.15
7d-0.57%NT$2.06NT$2.16
30d-14.33%NT$2.06NT$2.5
90d-35.34%NT$2.06NT$3.7
1y-7.45%NT$1.25NT$6.41
全部時間+58.36%NT$1.25(2024-09-12, 322 天前 )NT$6.41(2024-12-08, 235 天前 )
DOLA Borrowing Right價格歷史數據(所有時間)

DOLA Borrowing Right的最高價格是多少?

DBR兌換TWD的歷史最高價(ATH)為 NT$6.41,發生於 2024-12-08。相較於價格回撤了 DOLA Borrowing Right。

DOLA Borrowing Right的最低價格是多少?

DBR兌換TWD的歷史最低價(ATL)為 NT$1.25,發生於 2024-09-12。相較於DBR歷史最低價,目前DBR價格上漲了 DOLA Borrowing Right。

DOLA Borrowing Right價格預測

什麼時候是購買 DBR 的好時機? 我現在應該買入還是賣出 DBR?

在決定買入還是賣出 DBR 時,您必須先考慮自己的交易策略。長期交易者和短期交易者的交易活動也會有所不同。Bitget DBR 技術分析 可以提供您交易參考。
根據 DBR 4 小時技術分析,交易訊號為 賣出
根據 DBR 1 日技術分析,交易訊號為 買入
根據 DBR 1 週技術分析,交易訊號為 買入

DBR 在 2026 的價格是多少?

根據DBR的歷史價格表現預測模型,預計DBR的價格將在 2026 達到 NT$2.87

DBR 在 2031 的價格是多少?

2031,DBR的價格預計將上漲 +38.00%。 到 2031 底,預計DBR的價格將達到 NT$7.21,累計投資報酬率為 +169.23%。

熱門活動

常見問題

DOLA Borrowing Right 的目前價格是多少?

DOLA Borrowing Right 的即時價格為 NT$2.68(DBR/TWD),目前市值為 NT$0 TWD。由於加密貨幣市場全天候不間斷交易,DOLA Borrowing Right 的價格經常波動。您可以在 Bitget 上查看 DOLA Borrowing Right 的市場價格及其歷史數據。

DOLA Borrowing Right 的 24 小時交易量是多少?

在最近 24 小時內,DOLA Borrowing Right 的交易量為 NT$1.55M。

DOLA Borrowing Right 的歷史最高價是多少?

DOLA Borrowing Right 的歷史最高價是 NT$6.41。這個歷史最高價是 DOLA Borrowing Right 自推出以來的最高價。

我可以在 Bitget 上購買 DOLA Borrowing Right 嗎?

可以,DOLA Borrowing Right 目前在 Bitget 的中心化交易平台上可用。如需更詳細的說明,請查看我們很有幫助的 如何購買 dola-borrowing-right 指南。

我可以透過投資 DOLA Borrowing Right 獲得穩定的收入嗎?

當然,Bitget 推出了一個 機器人交易平台,其提供智能交易機器人,可以自動執行您的交易,幫您賺取收益。

我在哪裡能以最低的費用購買 DOLA Borrowing Right?

Bitget提供行業領先的交易費用和市場深度,以確保交易者能够從投資中獲利。 您可通過 Bitget 交易所交易。

在哪裡可以購買加密貨幣?

透過 Bitget App 購買
數分鐘完成帳戶註冊,即可透過信用卡或銀行轉帳購買加密貨幣。
Download Bitget APP on Google PlayDownload Bitget APP on AppStore
透過 Bitget 交易所交易
將加密貨幣存入 Bitget 交易所,交易流動性大且費用低

影片部分 - 快速認證、快速交易

play cover
如何在 Bitget 完成身分認證以防範詐騙
1. 登入您的 Bitget 帳戶。
2. 如果您是 Bitget 的新用戶,請觀看我們的教學,以了解如何建立帳戶。
3. 將滑鼠移到您的個人頭像上,點擊「未認證」,然後點擊「認證」。
4. 選擇您簽發的國家或地區和證件類型,然後根據指示進行操作。
5. 根據您的偏好,選擇「手機認證」或「電腦認證」。
6. 填寫您的詳細資訊,提交身分證影本,並拍攝一張自拍照。
7. 提交申請後,身分認證就完成了!
加密貨幣投資(包括透過 Bitget 線上購買 DOLA Borrowing Right)具有市場風險。Bitget 為您提供購買 DOLA Borrowing Right 的簡便方式,並且盡最大努力讓用戶充分了解我們在交易所提供的每種加密貨幣。但是,我們不對您購買 DOLA Borrowing Right 可能產生的結果負責。此頁面和其包含的任何資訊均不代表對任何特定加密貨幣的背書認可,任何價格數據均採集自公開互聯網,不被視為來自Bitget的買賣要約。

DBR/TWD 匯率換算器

DBR
TWD
1 DBR = 2.68 TWD,目前 1 DOLA Borrowing Right(DBR)兌換 TWD 的價格為 2.68。匯率即時更新,僅供參考。
在所有主流交易平台中,Bitget 提供最低的交易手續費。VIP 等級越高,費率越優惠。

DBR 資料來源

DOLA Borrowing Right評級
4.4
100 筆評分
合約:
0xAD03...dC5D710(Ethereum)
相關連結:

Bitget 觀點

Crypto Wolf Trades_
Crypto Wolf Trades_
21小時前
$ZOO will start exploding hard once market settles down a bit 💣💣 Will soon clear 0.00000430 for unstoppable pump 📈🚀 $insp $zora $dolo $rekt $dbr $giza $csky $troll $navx $omni $bifi $glm $asr $fis
DBR-0.56%
NAVX+3.57%
Crypto Wolf Trades_
Crypto Wolf Trades_
22小時前
New killer gem 💎 is coming soon Sitting rock bottom. Fully strong one Must hold for 2X or more gains🚀 Turn on notifications 🔔 30Likes & 15Rt before sharing ♻️ $insp $zora $dolo $rekt $dbr $giza $csky $troll $navx $omni $bifi $glm $asr $fis
DBR-0.56%
NAVX+3.57%
BGUSER-KWNV3VCX
BGUSER-KWNV3VCX
2天前
$CROSS down trend coming soon .. tp=0.20 everyone sell $CROSS $CROSS $CEC $NEIROETH $BONK $TURBO $DOGS $BANK $DBR
NEIROETH+4.33%
SOON+2.79%
papiofficial ᛤ
papiofficial ᛤ
2天前
This was an excellent article by @MarcinRedStone at @redstone_defi. The context of Push vs Pull brings me to my old Operations days where I spent time at Toyota and Amazon. This post is a reflection of my time and how Push vs Pull is relevant in blockchain discussions, not just Oracle design. I also share an example from my days at Amazon that is relevant to blockchain design. Read on. ORACLE DESIGN AND PUSH VS PULL Most Oracle design from 2019 is outdated, but the problem is: 1⃣Systems need data when the Oracle is sometimes not ready to give it. 2⃣Systems don't need data at that time, but the Oracle pushes it anyway. FEAST AND FAMINE PROBLEM In Queueing Theory, a very common downstream impact from unbalanced systems is the Feast and Famine problem. In the context of Oracle feeds, we get: 1: Dumb push systems leads to big issues around liquidation. 2: Dumb push systems leads to unnecessary costs that the customer has to bear: more updates, more gas costs. By using the word "dumb" I'm differentiating from "smart". A system can have smart push systems, but needs to be responsive to demand, volatility, and characteristics of the queue. BOTTLENECKS Which brings me to the main topic I want to discuss, which supports Marcin's thesis--and is borne from my time in manufacturing and graduate school--where I spent time hands-on in very large queueing systems. I spent years studying and improving systems characterized by a Queue: at Amazon, Toyota, consulting for Disneyland, and Airlines. Hint: almost all systems have a queue. Some important aspects that are important to remember that highlights the difference between push vs pull: WHAT IS A BOTTLENECK? 1⃣Every system has a bottleneck. 2⃣A bottleneck is a state of affairs where demand for service exceeds the capacity to serve. 3⃣The Throughput of a system is dependent on the Throughput of the Bottleneck. 4⃣Given (1), (2), & (3), for maximum output, a system ought to keep the bottleneck working at 100% capacity with little or no defects (scrap, waste (muda), time-traps). 5⃣Given (4), Non-bottleneck processes should be working at less than 100% capacity, so as to not over-burden the bottleneck with large batches of work-in-process (WIP). In Marcin's article, an Oracle that pushes data when the system doesn't need it at the time can be considered work-in-process, or WIP. Conversely, when the system of DeFi protocol needs the data, but the Oracle is not ready to provide it, it leads to liquidations. In lean manufacturing nomenclature, WIP is considered one of the 7 Wastes, or Muda, because it doesn't add value to the customer. The customer in this case is the system that needs the data feed and their customers, the end user who is interacting with the DeFi protocol. So what's the solution? DRUM-BUFFER-ROPE The age-old solution to the feast vs famine problem in systems is the Drum-Buffer-Rope. Visually, THE DRUM The Bottleneck or Constraint, acts as a Drum: it sets the rhythm that the whole system should follow. In Lean Manufacturing, this is also called “Takt Time.” THE BUFFER There are situations when when upstream processes can’t produce as much as is needed by the Bottleneck. The result: the Constraint is starved and overall system output is compromised. So, we must have a buffer of inventory that is the size of the accounted-for variation is demand. This will help to level-out variation. A Buffer will assure that the Constraint never has to wait and, waiting is one of the 7 wastes we want to reduce or eliminate. Similarly, if upstream processes are producing more than the Constraint has the capacity to handle, then there’s going to be excess inventory sitting in front of the Constraint and, hence, a feast. 💡Put another way, the Buffer is the inventory and inventory is directly related to Lead Time. (I'll write another post on Little's Law that will help to quantify what I'm talking about that will be interesting to @MaxResnick1 who has a background in operations research and I know thinks about this stuff). This phenomena is sometimes called the Feast-of-Famine Syndrome. DBR is used to avoid either of these scenarios, the Feast or the Famine, by dictating the batch size and frequency of the inputs into the Buffer. THE ROPE The Rope is a method by which the Constraint can signal to the upstream processes (non-bottleneck processes) when to slow down, when to stop, or when to produce faster and the quantity. This is called “Pull Scheduling” in Lean Manufacturing terms. In software data structures, this can be implemented as a data structure called a Stack, with “Push” and “Pop” as the methods for pulling from the Stack. 💡And in Oracle design, it's a flexible Pull method during slow times, and then the Oracle can switch to a Push method during really volatile times. This is where @redstone_defi shines with its modern Oracle design vs its competitors. AN APPLICATION OF DRUM-BUFFER-ROPE When I was with Amazon, I led a project where I investigated a production line that was experiencing a Feast/Famine scenario. There was a lot of waste on this line and it impacted daily production in a serious way. As the team lead, I set out to observe, interview the operators, and collect data on this line. I quantified the cost to Amazon that was a result of the Feast/Famine scenario: costs in terms of actual dollars resulting from missed orders, upgraded orders, overtime of operators, product damage, and safety issues. Here's what the system looked like: The distribution you see above is best approximated by the Poisson Distribution, which means that the Mean and the Standard Deviation are approximately the same. What does this mean? The picture above graphically shows the Feast scenario: product in totes arrive at the constraint ALL at the same time. How does this look? Imagine product and totes everywhere, falling off the conveyor belt, and hundreds of people at the problem area trying to fix it. Push systems are inherently bad and cause all sorts of issues. Unless the system is a smart push system, but blind or dumb push systems cause all sorts of havoc. Solution to the above problem? I led a team of software and industrial engineers that re-engineered this line and we implemented a DBR solution, where the pack-rate at the Constraint would dictate what the upstream pick-rate should be. In other words, we made sure that the pick-rate would never be higher than the pack-rate. This solution worked and Amazon, was applied to every single operation worldwide, and saved Amazon a lot of money and customers benefit. Footnote: much of the content above was from an article I wrote about the Theory of Constraints a long time ago for a magazine. I updated it and applied it to Oracle and Blockchain design.
DBR-0.56%
GAS+1.53%
Crypto Wolf Trades_
Crypto Wolf Trades_
2天前
$ISP huge Token burns will happen today & you will see big price action These next few days ISP reversal kicks off towards 10x+ run upside 📈 $insp $zora $dolo $rekt $dbr $giza $csky $troll $navx $omni $bifi $glm $asr $fis
DBR-0.56%
NAVX+3.57%