INVITE Token 價格INVITE

2/ Duel Arena by Cambria The Age of AFK Fishing is over, the time of the Aggro Axe has arrived! @playdegenarena Invite-Only Beta will open this Wednesday. Docs and Invite codes coming soon!

What a big day for @billions_ntwk 👏 Kudos to @provenauthority @jgonzalezferrer for making such an innovative product all so exciting! 1️⃣ Billions is #1 @KaitoAI Pre-TGE Arena - With 11.42% of mindshare, they're x2 the #2! - Despite no details on reward distribution, yappers are fighting for a place on the leaderboard! 2️⃣ Next, they set up a Kaito Leaderboard - Signalling an intent to TGE in 1-2 quarters - Being an identity platform, the 🪂 is likely exclusive to users of their platform (Check reply for invite link!) 3️⃣ Finally, they announced a public sale with Kaito Launchpad with great terms: - 12:00PM UTC, 6th Aug 2025 - Valuation: $200M | Target raise: $5M+ 👍 - Vesting: 75% unlock at TGE, 25% over 12 months 🔥 - Min Allocation: $1K | Max: $100K 🥲 With over 1.1M users, Billions is the 1st universal human & AI network, employing zk identity proofs. Of course, it's powered by @0xPolygon !

I'm old enough to recall when public discourse was encouraged and not mistaken for hostility or “negativity,” but welcomed as a sign of engagement. In that spirit, I’m offering a response to Peter Bauman’s (@monkantony_tez) recent essay “Post(human)-AI Art”, which was presented as a bold articulation of a new phase in AI-influenced art practice. The piece makes sweeping claims about historical lineages, conceptual shifts, and artistic futures. When declarations like this are put into the public sphere, especially under the banner of a prominent platform like Le Random (@lerandomart), they invite, and deserve, critical dialogue. This is not about gatekeeping or bad faith critique, it’s about taking ideas seriously enough to respond when they overreach or simplify. This article attempts to define a movement (“Post-AI Art”) and insert it into an art-historical lineage alongside net art and Post-Internet Art, but it does so with the superficiality of a speculative blog post masquerading as theory. Its references to Nietzsche, Foucault, Derrida, Haraway, and Bridle seem to be deployed more for mood and name-dropping than rigorous conceptual development. There's no meaningful engagement with these thinkers, just fragmented quotes strung together to grant borrowed gravitas to a shaky premise. The sweeping historical analogies (net art → AI Art, Post-Internet → Post-AI) are lazy and ahistorical, flattening complex movements into tidy narratives with no substantiating analysis. Attempts at canon-making (e.g., defining AI Art 1.0/2.0 or Post-AI’s “core tenets”) are assertive but under-researched, built on selective artist name-checks and generalized vibes rather than close readings or critical distinctions. The overall tone feels algorithmic, like a ChatGPT summary of a lecture it didn’t fully understand. It wants to stake out critical terrain, but lacks the structural coherence, dialectical tension, and argumentative discipline of serious writing. In short, it’s thinly theorized art-world branding, not a foundational text.

I’ve heard @Surf_Copilot could be the Bloomberg of AI crypto Who has an invite link for me?

Ok, I got an invite code to @ReiNetwork0x beta AI terminal. Been testing it for the past hour. It's insanely good.