California Bans Forced Liquidation of Unclaimed Crypto Assets
- California enacts law safeguarding unclaimed cryptocurrency from forced liquidation.
- First U.S. state to protect digital assets.
- Could impact financial arrangements and asset management.
Governor Gavin Newsom signed SB 822 on October 11, 2025, making California the first U.S. state to ban forced liquidation of unclaimed cryptocurrency.
The new law secures digital assets, potentially reducing market volatility by halting automatic conversion, affecting Bitcoin and Ethereum primarily, with implications for other digital financial assets.
California Governor Gavin Newsom signed SB 822 into law on October 11, 2025, prohibiting the state from automatically liquidating unclaimed cryptocurrency. This move establishes California as a pioneer in securing digital assets against forced sales.
California’s Legislative Move
Sponsored by Senator Josh Becker , the legislation mandates the California State Controller’s Office to retain unclaimed digital assets in-kind. This ensures assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum remain untouched unless claimed within specified durations.
“Thank you Gavin Newsom for signing SB 822, which stops the state from liquidating Californians’ unclaimed crypto investments without their consent.” – Paul Grewal, Chief Legal Officer, Coinbase
The ban on forced liquidation could have significant implications for cryptocurrency holders and the broader industry. Asset security is prioritized by maintaining digital form, offering protection against abrupt market selling pressures. Analysts suggest that these measures might encourage more states to adopt similar frameworks, reinforcing digital custody norms. However, the initiative incurs costs for the state, primarily in appointing qualified custodians and managing preserved assets.
This legislative action curtails forced sales, potentially insulating market values and influencing crypto market dynamics. While no immediate impact is observed on trading volumes, long-term effects on asset liquidity and management are anticipated. Protection efforts align with global trends seeking increased security for digital currency holders. As other states consider emulating California’s approach, the potential for broader regulatory changes in crypto asset management emerges.
