Do your own research.
Written by: le.hl
Translated by: Luffy, Foresight News
As an investor, the easiest way to lose money is to blindly follow the crowd, entering a project without knowing anything about it and relying solely on others' advice. I have experienced this myself, so I am sharing my own project research experience here.
If you are a crypto newcomer looking for reliable practical methods, this article is prepared for you.

Narrative is one of the core elements of the crypto industry, and market trends often revolve around narratives. If you want to invest in a project, you must first understand the narrative logic behind it. If a project is still stuck on outdated narratives like Metaverse or GameFi, it is unlikely to succeed.
I usually check project narratives on CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko.
Steps:
After understanding the narrative, the next step is to identify the leading project in that sector. Observe its recent trading volume changes to judge the dynamics; at the same time, evaluate whether the project you are following has the ability to compete with the leader. Remember, investing in the competitors of the leading project often offers more opportunities than chasing after the already skyrocketed leader.
Choosing currently popular narratives (such as AI, prediction market InfoFi, etc.) is the best path to profit.

Nowadays, many people dislike the term "venture capital" and prefer projects that are self-funded. But the fact is: if a project’s product is not excellent, the team is average, and it is not a leader in any narrative, then it needs reliable investors to drive its development.
The platform I use most often to check project investors is CryptoFundraising. It displays all key information about a project, including investors, team, social accounts, official website, etc., and it is completely free.
Steps:
I have found that projects with less funding and only 2-3 venture capital supporters usually perform better than those with more than 20 VCs involved. It’s like a cake being divided among too many people; the team needs to get approval from all VCs for decisions, which can be very restrictive.
The level of the VC is also crucial. Personally, I prefer projects supported by these VCs: Coinbase VC, a16z, Polychain Capital, Paradigm, GSR.

This step is very important. If a project disables comments or frequently changes its social account nickname, just avoid it.
The "number of well-known mutual followers" is also worth referencing: if more than 20 industry influencers follow the project, it is usually a positive signal.

To verify the legitimacy of a project, you can also use Ethos Network:
No Ethos invitation code is needed; you can use this extension for free.

I prefer to invest in projects where the founder is active in the crypto community every day and interacts with the community. Outstanding founders believe in their projects and are willing to admit mistakes.
Avoid founders who claim the community is everything but act aloof and disconnected from users, or anonymous founders.
The founder's behavior often determines the project's direction after launch.
Ease of use is the indicator I value most. Only simple, user-friendly products can attract real users and generate revenue.
No matter how cool the concept is (such as "quantum blockchain solves global hunger"), if it is complicated and hard to use, no one will pay attention.
For projects with tokens already issued, be cautious if you see the following: tokens are allocated to groups unrelated to the project (for example, for short-term hype, tokens are allocated to platforms like Binance Alpha without any substantial support). This behavior usually leads to a failed TGE and poor subsequent price performance.
The tokenomics does not require all tokens to be distributed to the community, but there must be a clear and transparent unlocking schedule for all stakeholders (including the team). Team transparency is always the top priority.
To check tokenomics and unlocking plans, you can use Dropstab: