The digital euro, an ambitious project of the European Central Bank (ECB), promises to transform payments in Europe. Led by Christine Lagarde, it generates as much enthusiasm as mistrust. Between financial innovation and concerns for individual freedoms, this project fits into a context where crypto redefines the rules of money. What will its real impact be on the economy and European citizens?
Christine Lagarde presents the digital euro as:
According to her, this digital currency will enable instant, free, and accessible payments to all, even without an internet connection. All this while guaranteeing confidentiality comparable to current systems.
The project, budgeted at 1.3 billion euros, aims for a gradual launch by 2027. Lagarde emphasizes its complementary nature to cash. Indeed, it offers a public alternative to private solutions such as bank cards or electronic wallets. For the ECB, the goal is to meet the needs of an increasingly digitalized economy while preserving the stability of the European financial system.
The digital euro is not unanimous, especially in the crypto ecosystem. Critics point to risks of increased surveillance and state control over financial transactions. For them, a digital currency issued by a central bank opposes the decentralization principles that underpin the spirit of cryptocurrencies. In France, political voices rise to denounce this project. Éric Ciotti even proposed a law aiming to ban the digital euro, advocating instead for adopting bitcoin as an alternative currency.
In France, Éric Ciotti proposes a law aiming to ban the digital euro. In Germany, parties such as the AfD call to recognize bitcoin as a national priority , arguing that the digital euro could lead to an overly intrusive financial system. These criticisms reflect growing mistrust towards central institutions and their ability to guarantee privacy.
At the end of October 2025, the European Union banned the Russian stablecoin A7A5 , accused of circumventing sanctions and financing the war in Ukraine. This stablecoin, backed by the ruble, allowed Russia to maintain financial exchanges despite embargoes. By banning it, the EU displays its intention to control monetary flows on its territory and limit the influence of foreign digital currencies.
This decision raises questions: is the EU looking to eliminate competition to facilitate the adoption of its own CBDC? In this context, bitcoin emerges as a neutral and censorship-resistant solution. While states develop their sovereign digital currencies, BTC remains the only fully decentralized asset, favored by those who reject a financial system controlled by central banks. A symbolic but also practical resistance in a landscape where crypto redraws the frontiers of finance.
The digital euro crystallizes hopes for a modern financial Europe according to Christine Lagarde, but also fears of an overly controlled system. Between innovation and preservation of freedoms, the debate remains intense. As states and central banks move their pieces, crypto, and particularly bitcoin , continues to represent a decentralized alternative. Will the balance between regulation and financial freedom be possible?