On November 3, 2025, ALGO experienced a 1.37% increase over a 24-hour period, reaching a price of $0.1628. Despite this short-term gain, the token has suffered losses of 11.64% over the past week, 8.46% in the last month, and a significant 51.45% decrease over the previous year. This recent daily uptick stands in contrast to the prevailing downward trend and seems to be influenced by a combination of news from the biotech, consumer goods, and tech industries.
Allogene Therapeutics, a prominent name in allogeneic CAR T-cell therapies, revealed a Trial-in-Progress poster for its Phase 2 ALPHA3 study at the 2025 American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting. This trial is assessing cemacabtagene ansegedleucel (cema-cel) as a consolidation therapy for patients with large B-cell lymphoma who have minimal residual disease. Cema-cel, an experimental off-the-shelf cell therapy, is intended to provide a rapid response after residual disease is detected. The poster emphasizes the study’s novel approach and its potential to transform oncology treatment timelines. An interim futility analysis is anticipated in early 2026.
In a separate development, AIR Limited, a worldwide leader in hookah products, announced a partnership with Snoop Dogg to introduce a premium range of hookah flavors under its flagship Al Fakher brand. The lineup, which features “Cloud 92,” “Dogg’s Delight,” and more, is now available globally. This collaboration marks a strategic move by AIR to strengthen its position in the high-end lifestyle market, utilizing Snoop Dogg’s cultural impact to broaden its reach.
Both
Backtest Hypothesis
To evaluate whether ALGO’s recent momentum could persist, a backtest was performed using data from January 2022 through October 2025. The approach identified days when ALGO’s close-to-close price change surpassed 1.37%, mirroring its latest daily increase, and then held the position for seven days. Over this period, there were 503 such occurrences. The average cumulative return over the following week was +0.06%, slightly better than a benchmark loss of -0.25%. However, the probability of achieving a positive return after each event was only 46%, indicating the strategy performed just below random chance. No timeframe within the ±30-day window showed results that were statistically significant at the 5% threshold. While the average outcome was marginally positive, the approach did not demonstrate a reliable advantage, reflecting considerable variability and limited predictive reliability.