Bitcoin is approaching a crucial turning point as institutional investments, changes in Federal Reserve policy, and overall economic sentiment come together to define a new direction for the cryptocurrency. Experts at TradingNEWS.com suggest that a mix of strong underlying demand, supportive monetary policies, and limited leverage has created one of the most promising bullish scenarios since 2021, as highlighted in an
Recent figures further highlight this trend. On October 29, U.S. Spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded a net inflow of $202.4 million, fueled by robust gains in leading funds. Grayscale’s IBIT saw an increase of $59.6 million, Fidelity’s FBTC brought in $67.0 million, and
 Technical analysis supports this positive outlook. To sustain its upward momentum, Bitcoin needs to remain above $109,000, with a retest of the $125,000 peak and a move toward $130,000 or higher considered likely, according to the same Investing.com article. Analysts point out that reduced volatility and record-breaking inflows indicate that investors are focusing on accumulating Bitcoin rather than speculating, a trend that has historically led to prolonged bull markets. Although short-term pullbacks may occur, the general expectation is for the rally to continue, given Bitcoin’s alignment with larger economic trends.
The relationship between monetary policy and Bitcoin’s market behavior is pivotal. With the Federal Reserve hinting at possible rate reductions in 2026 and global trade disputes subsiding, Bitcoin’s role as a safeguard against inflation and geopolitical risks is becoming more prominent, as noted in the Investing.com report. This situation is reminiscent of the 2021 bull run, when a dovish Fed and increased institutional participation drove demand higher. However, the current landscape is further strengthened by the evolution of the ETF market, which offers a regulated and straightforward entry point for institutional investors.
The third source referenced in the original material covers Dominion Energy’s offshore wind initiatives in Virginia, but it does not pertain to Bitcoin’s price movements or macroeconomic factors and is therefore excluded from this discussion.