BlueMove价格MOVE

I have been following this recent news about Bit Origin, a Nasdaq-listed company (stock code BTOG), and their move to purchase a significant amount of Dogecoin as part of their corporate strategy. According to their official announcement, they have completed their first Dogecoin purchase, totaling 40,543,745 DOGE at an average price of approximately 0.2466 US dollars per coin, with a total investment of around ten million US dollars. What stands out here is that this purchase comes less than a week after they publicly announced the establishment of a corporate-grade Dogecoin treasury. Furthermore, Bit Origin has reportedly secured up to five hundred million US dollars in combined equity and debt financing capacity, which they intend to use to support and advance this Dogecoin treasury strategy over time. This is a significant financial commitment and signals that they are taking this approach very seriously, rather than treating it as a short-term speculative play. Now, in terms of whether I view this move positively and whether Dogecoin could truly have its own "MicroStrategy moment," I think it is worth looking at this from a few different angles. First, Dogecoin itself has always been something of an outlier in the cryptocurrency world. Unlike Bitcoin or Ethereum, it does not have the same level of technical innovation, nor has it been positioned historically as a serious store of value. Its value has largely come from community strength, meme culture, celebrity endorsements (Elon Musk in particular), and speculative waves. That said, over time Dogecoin has managed to remain surprisingly resilient, and it has developed a strong, loyal following with real transaction volume and increasing integration into payment systems. What Bit Origin is attempting seems to be a strategic bet on Dogecoin evolving from meme coin status into something with more corporate and institutional legitimacy much like how MicroStrategy made Bitcoin an institutional asset through their aggressive treasury strategy. However, the key difference is that Bitcoin already had a strong narrative around digital gold, scarcity, and decentralized monetary policy. Dogecoin does not have those fundamentals; it has infinite supply and inflationary issuance, which makes it a very different asset class. That said, markets are not always rational in the short term. If Bit Origin’s moves inspire other companies to follow suit, or if Dogecoin continues to receive endorsements from influential figures, there could be a momentum play here. Perception creates reality in speculative markets. If this corporate treasury model catches on even just among smaller companies it could give Dogecoin renewed purpose beyond just retail speculation. As for whether I am personally bullish or bearish on this kind of strategy: I think it is bold, and it carries both high risk and high reward potential. I would not necessarily compare Bit Origin directly to MicroStrategy because the scale, the asset, and the macroeconomic conditions are all quite different. However, it does show that companies are still looking for creative ways to leverage crypto assets in 2025. I would not rush into Dogecoin purely because of this news alone, but it is worth watching how this narrative develops. If Bit Origin continues buying and manages to position itself as a "Dogecoin treasury leader," it could attract attention and possibly new demand. At the end of the day, it comes down to whether Dogecoin can sustain relevance beyond memes. If it can become a more recognized and accepted means of payment or a corporate treasury asset, then Bit Origin might be ahead of the curve. But if it remains primarily speculative, this strategy could backfire hard. Curious to hear how others view this. Do you see this as the start of something bigger for Dogecoin, or just another headline that will fade with time? Are we looking at MicroStrategy 2.0, or just another short-lived hype cycle?

早上的丝路将近一千的空间，喂嘴里边，岂不是香迷糊了！ $BTC $ETH $DOGS $ETC $LTC $SOLO $PROPS $DBR $MOVE

美银首席投资策略师迈克尔·哈内特近期发出重磅警告，该行多项专有交易规则已触发“卖出”信号，而他提示，若市场迎来抛售，触发点或许不在股市而在债市。 从具体信号来看，美国银行基金经理调查现金规则显示，当前基金经理管理资产中现金占比达3.9%，已触及卖出信号线。回顾2011年以来的15次类似情况，标普500指数平均下跌2%。全球资金流向交易规则也亮了“红灯”，过去四周全球股票与高收益债券的资金流入占管理资产比例为0.9%，虽较上周的1.0%略有下降，但已触发卖出信号。不过，全球广度规则暂未达标，MSCI全球股票指数中，交易价格高于50日及200日移动平均线的成分股比例为64%，低于上周的80%，尚未达到88%的卖出阈值。 尽管股市持续刷新新高，哈内特却提醒，关注抛售触发因素不能只盯着股市，债市才是关键。他此前就有“空头盯住债券，多头盯住股票”的论断，如今更是强调30年期美债的重要性。近期30年期美债收益率在关键水平附近徘徊，上周曾短暂突破5%，尤其在市场担忧特朗普可能解雇鲍威尔引发小范围恐慌时更为明显。当前美债收益率尚未创新高，且MOVE指数维持在80左右，市场仍处于“风险偏好”状态。但他明确表示，一旦长期美债收益率创新高且MOVE指数突破100，他将转向“风险规避”立场。 在美股方面，哈内特的关注点仍集中在市场广度的异常收缩上：股票价格处于高位，市场广度却在低位。具体表现为，等权重标普500指数与标普500指数的比值处于22年低点，小型股罗素2000指数与标普500指数的比值接近25年低点，价值股与成长股的比值更是处于30年低点。在他看来，这一现象预示着美国经济可能“放缓”，或美股正形成泡沫。相较之下，全球股市中价值股和小型股表现更优，市场情绪也更为正常。 此外，哈内特还谈及特朗普与鲍威尔之间的“冲突”——特朗普持续施压美联储主席降息，这让他联想到20世纪70年代初的情景。1971年8月15日，尼克松推出“新经济政策”，终结布雷顿森林体系、实施工资物价冻结及10%进口关税，当时失业率6%、CPI为4%，时任美联储主席阿瑟·伯恩斯在同年8月至12月间降息225个基点，进一步加剧了经济的繁荣与萧条周期。哈内特认为，当前特朗普与鲍威尔的纠葛，或许是历史的重演。 当下市场虽仍弥漫着“风险偏好”，但哈内特的警告已为市场敲响警钟，债市的风吹草动或将成为点燃下一轮抛售的导火索。$BTC $ETH

#MOVE 下跌通道如果成功突破，预计获得1-2x看涨浪潮~ 积累区域：0.16-0.15 销售预期：30-200%$MOVE

#USTC 板块：稳定币 积累区域：0.0157-0.0145 销售预期：30-150%+$USTC $MOVE $TRU