Usualの‌価格USUAL

$GORK dirty tricks as usual but supported by u kno who…

There is a discussion going on among crypto enthusiasts, with the topic being that someone is adamant about tanking the stablecoin legislation. The main suggested culprits are regional US banks, and Ripple’s CTO David Schwartz seems to agree , saying: “That’s what I’m hearing.” Fear has been cited as the main reason why this may be true. Banks fear stablecoins could disintermediate their market share, with critics like Senator Elizabeth Warren proposing amendments to block tech firms from issuing stablecoins. This just highlights tensions between traditional finance and crypto innovation. The notion isn’t anything new, as it’s been talked about before how traditional banking institutions perceive stablecoins as a competitive threat to their dominance in payment systems. This also explains why the stablecoin bill GENIUS Act failed in its recent vote. One of the main legislations surrounding stablecoins is the GENIUS Act. Short for ‘Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins’, it seeks to regulate stablecoin issuers and integrate them into the US financial system. Two months ago, the GENIUS Act passed the Senate Banking Committee with an 18-6 vote to regulate stablecoins comprehensively. However, earlier this month, it failed to pass a full Senate vote, as the bill didn’t get the 60 votes needed due to nine Senate Democrats withdrawing their support, as well as two of their Republican peers. Some mentioned the insufficient anti-money laundering provisions and potential national security risks as reasons for withdrawal, while other reasons were reports of Donald Trump’s ties to crypto ventures, including a $2 billion investment in a Trump-affiliated stablecoin. Such a turn of events could point to deep divisions and the influence of external factors like the banking sector lobbying. The interplay between traditional banking interests and emerging crypto regulations will likely shape the future of the financial industry. If the GENIUS Act or any similar stablecoin bills pass in the future, it could be seen as a potential disruptor to banks’ traditional financial services. For instance, stablecoins could enable peer-to-peer transactions without the need for usual banking intermediaries. Whatever the case, the sooner this is done, the better it will be for the crypto industry, as clear and fair regulations could bolster investor confidence, while prolonged uncertainty may hinder the growth of the crypto sector. Still, one thing is for sure – the outcome of the GENIUS Act will set precedents for how digital assets are integrated and regulated within the US financial framework. Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

$ORDI I'm watching for a potential mid-range reversal pattern; you can place limit orders before the next upward leg. $people $ethfi $wct $sats $syrup $xvg $bome $fxs $lqty $ray $usual

If $BTC fails to break $105,000, I expect a retest of the green box before continuing higher. $people $ethfi $wct $sats $syrup $xvg $bome $fxs $lqty $ray $usual

probably might have to play the 15m-1h trend instead of my usual 4h-Daily to not stay sidelined