Shanghai Songjiang Court: The purpose of purchasing "mining" equipment is not for daily consumption and is not protected by the Consumer Rights Prote
The Shanghai Songjiang Court recently heard a dispute over an information network purchase and sale contract. It is reported that the plaintiff spent more than 100,000 yuan to purchase a batch of "mining" equipment, but found that some parts were actually second-hand goods, so he sued for a refund and compensation of three times the amount. After trial, the Songjiang Court believed that the premise of applying the Consumer Rights Protection Law is to purchase and use goods for daily consumption needs. In this case, Mr. Li did not purchase and use the goods for daily consumption needs, and whether he has already made a profit is not the basis for judging whether he is an ordinary consumer. Therefore, the dispute in this case does not apply to the Consumer Rights Protection Law, and the claim for "refund and compensation of three times the amount" is unfounded, and the court does not support it.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Discover Enormous Potential in Cryptocurrency’s Next Big Wave
In Brief The crypto market is showing similarities to the Dot-Com bubble era. There is a bullish expectation for XRP and SEI with potential price increases. Institutional interest in crypto may support Bitcoin and altcoins' prices.

Trump Declares Broad Support for Cryptocurrencies

Animoca and Cream Labs Invest in TrendX Platform

JPMorgan Completes First Public Tokenized Bond Trade

Trending news
MoreCrypto prices
More








