Cultural Conflicts in Ethereum: Dissent, Decentralization, and Progress
The biggest advantage of Ethereum lies in its adaptability.
Original Title: "Ethereum's culture clash: Dissent, decentralization and progress"
Author: Macauley Peterson, Blockworks
Translated by: Deng Tong, Jinse Finance
The Ethereum community is at a cultural crossroads, with the intense reactions to the departure of prominent contributor Max Resnick revealing deeper tensions surrounding governance and dissent. Resnick's criticisms of Ethereum's governance and scalability approaches have elicited overwhelming negative responses, including accusations of being a "Solana factory" and other personal attacks. These responses highlight broader issues within the social layer and decision-making processes of Ethereum.
Extremism in Ethereum
Ethereum extremism has begun to reflect some of the less constructive characteristics of Bitcoin extremism. Arguments about the increasing suppression of dissent are rampant, with critics being labeled as outsiders or adversaries. While Resnick's criticisms highlight real challenges, they have also been met with hostility. His communication style is often perceived as confrontational, alienating key contributors. Some in the community view his departure as a positive factor that reinforces shared values and emphasizes that dissent must be constructive to avoid division.
This is not unique to Resnick. Others, like Jon Charbonneau, have also challenged the idea of decentralization as an abstract ideal, arguing that it stifles productive debate in practice. Charbonneau wrote in his blog post "The North Star of Ethereum": "If decentralization is the only goal, then why not lower the block gas limit, reduce the number of blobs, and increase slot time? Often, shouting 'Aha, this is sacrificing decentralization!' is just used to end productive debate."
Charbonneau emphasizes that Ethereum needs to define its unique purpose. He urges the community to adhere to long-term principles and avoid decisions driven by short-term dynamics.
Social Layer: Advantage or Disadvantage?
Ethereum's reliance on social consensus has long been hailed as a decentralized alternative to formal governance. However, this approach has its drawbacks. Even though Ethereum's core development process operates transparently and attracts diverse stakeholders, decision-making often seems dominated by loud and influential voices on platforms like Twitter.
Core developers follow a consensus-driven process, building publicly to ensure decisions reflect a wide range of opinions. This process resists formal capture, but if dissenting voices are excluded, it risks stagnation. Resnick regularly contributed to Eth Research, sharing insights on scalability and governance, but he did not participate in ACD calls or engage extensively in events.
Lessons from Bitcoin
The rise of Bitcoin, including its surge to $100,000, has not been driven solely by extremism. It stems from ongoing advocacy efforts that engage governments, institutions, and the public in building a strong socio-economic narrative. In contrast, Ethereum has largely avoided real-world advocacy, focusing instead on maintaining its spirit of decentralization.
The future of Ethereum depends on balancing conviction and inclusivity. The community must recognize that technological advancement alone is not enough—strong cultural foundations are equally important. Purity tests and unchecked extremism can stifle innovation and debate, so mechanisms that promote open dialogue without undermining decentralization must be introduced.
Ethereum's greatest strength lies in its adaptability. By proactively addressing cultural challenges, the community can retain valuable contributors and ensure Ethereum's leadership as a decentralized, inclusive ecosystem.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
New spot margin trading pair — HOLO/USDT!
FUN drops by 32.34% within 24 hours as it faces a steep short-term downturn
- FUN plunged 32.34% in 24 hours to $0.008938, marking a 541.8% monthly loss amid prolonged bearish trends. - Technical breakdowns, elevated selling pressure, and forced liquidations highlight deteriorating market sentiment and risk-off behavior. - Analysts identify key support below $0.0080 as critical, with bearish momentum confirmed by RSI (<30) and MACD indicators. - A trend-following backtest strategy proposes short positions based on technical signals to capitalize on extended downward trajectories.

OPEN has dropped by 189.51% within 24 hours during a significant market pullback
- OPEN's price plummeted 189.51% in 24 hours to $0.8907, marking its largest intraday decline in history. - The token fell 3793.63% over 7 days, matching identical monthly and yearly declines, signaling severe bearish momentum. - Technical analysts cite broken support levels and lack of bullish catalysts as key drivers of the sustained sell-off. - Absence of stabilizing volume or reversal patterns leaves the market vulnerable to further downward pressure.

New spot margin trading pair — LINEA/USDT!
Trending news
MoreCrypto prices
More








