Banks warn of risk of $6,6 trillion migration to stablecoins
- US Banks Predict Trillion-Dollar Migration to Stablecoins
- GENIUS Law may have a loophole for indirect income
- Crypto sector criticizes warning and accuses defense of profits
A coalition of US banking groups, led by the Bank Policy Institute (BPI), has called on Congress to revise the language of the recently passed GENIUS Act for stablecoins, pointing to a loophole that could trigger the transfer of up to $6,6 trillion in bank deposits into digital assets.
The BPI recognized that the law already prohibits stablecoin issuers from paying yields or interest directly to holders. However, he emphasized that the current wording does not prevent cryptocurrency exchanges or affiliated companies from partnering with issuers to offer indirect earnings.
According to the group, this possibility would pose a significant risk to the traditional banking system, reducing lending capacity, raising interest rates, and increasing credit costs for businesses and households. "Congress must protect the flow of credit to American businesses and households and the stability of the most important financial market by closing the stablecoin interest payment loophole," the group stated.
The stance drew immediate backlash from the crypto sector. Coinbase's chief legal officer, Paul Grewal, called the concern overblown, noting that similar proposals have already been rejected by Congress.
"This wasn't a loophole, and you know it. 376 Democrats and Republicans in the House and Senate rejected your unbridled effort to prevent competition. A president did it too."
declared.
Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong echoed the criticism, suggesting that banks are more interested in protecting profit margins than avoiding systemic risks. Jake Chervinsky, general counsel at Variant Fund, added that the regulatory influence of financial institutions has been insufficient to prevent the sector's evolution and that the warning's motivations are primarily self-preservation.
Mikko Ohtama, co-founder of Trading Protocol, argued that banks' resistance is linked to the impact of stablecoins on traditional deposit models. He believes the solution lies in improving savings account offerings and similar products. "People won't withdraw money from banks if they offer them a good deal," he concluded.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Brevis receives collective praise from the Ethereum community—Is ZK finally becoming practical?
Brevis has achieved proof for 99.6% of Ethereum blocks within 12 seconds, with an average of only 6.9 seconds, using just 64 RTX 5090 GPUs.

From SDK to "Zero-Code" DEX Building: Orderly's Three-Year Masterpiece
Orderly ONE proves that sticking to one thing and doing it to the extreme is the right approach.

The Ethereum community collectively gives a thumbs up: Has ZK technology finally moved from the lab to production-grade tools?
Brevis has achieved proof for 99.6% of Ethereum blocks within 12 seconds, with an average time of only 6.9 seconds, using just 64 RTX 5090 GPUs.

When the market complains about CZ, people begin to miss SBF
SBF interview: The bankruptcy lawyers won, the creditors received full repayment, and the one who could have made them even richer is now waiting for the day when the world recognizes the truth.

Trending news
MoreCrypto prices
More








