After the epic crypto liquidation on "10.11", how are the stocks of DAT companies doing?

Original Title: "After the Crypto Crash, Are DAT Companies' Stocks Still Okay?"

Original Link: David, Deep Tide TechFlow

On the afternoon of the 10th, President Trump announced on Truth Social a 100% tariff on Chinese goods. This news instantly triggered panic across global financial markets.

Within the following 24 hours, the crypto market experienced the largest liquidation event in its history, with over $19 billions in leveraged positions forcibly closed. Bitcoin plummeted from $117,000, briefly dropping below $102,000, with a daily decline of over 12%.

The US stock market was not spared either. By the close on October 10, the S&P 500 Index had fallen 2.71%, the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 878 points, and the Nasdaq Composite Index fell 3.58%, all marking the largest single-day declines since April.

However, the real disaster zone was the DAT (Digital Asset Treasury) companies that hold crypto assets as treasury reserves.

MicroStrategy, as the largest corporate holder of bitcoin, saw its stock price take a hit as well; other crypto asset reserve companies experienced even more dramatic plunges. According to after-hours trading data, investors continued to sell off.

For these companies exposed to both crypto and stock market risks, has the worst already passed?

Why Did DAT Companies Fall Even Harder?

The first challenge DAT companies face is the direct impact on their balance sheets. Take MicroStrategy as an example: the company holds about 639,835 bitcoins. When bitcoin's price drops 12%, it means nearly $10 billions in asset value evaporates instantly.

Such losses must be recorded as "unrealized losses" under accounting standards. Although it's not a real loss unless sold, the numbers on the financial report are very real.

As an investor, what you see is a company's core assets rapidly depreciating. There's also a multiplier effect regarding market confidence.

At the beginning of 2025, MicroStrategy's stock net asset value (NAV) premium was as high as 2x, but by the end of September, it had compressed to 1.44x; currently, it's around 1.2.

For some other companies, mNAV is almost returning to 1, and some have even dropped below 1. These changes reflect a harsh reality: confidence in the DAT model is wavering in extreme market conditions.

In a bull market, investors are willing to give these companies a premium, with the narrative being that they are pioneers of crypto innovation. But when the market turns, the same story becomes an unnecessary risk exposure.

Non-bitcoin cryptocurrencies suffered massive technical damage in this round of leverage-induced crash, with some even instantly dropping to zero; even large-cap altcoins saw their prices halved or worse due to insufficient liquidity.

And the stocks of companies holding these assets became the first targets for short selling as market sentiment deteriorated.

When panic strikes, investors need to reduce their positions quickly. While the bitcoin market trades 24/7, large sell orders can severely impact prices. In contrast, selling stocks like MSTR or COIN on Nasdaq is much easier.

Selling hundreds of billions of dollars in gold won't disrupt the market, but selling $70 billions in bitcoin could cause a price collapse and trigger mass liquidations; this liquidity difference makes DAT company stocks a fast exit channel for capital.

Worse still, many institutional investors have strict risk control red lines. When volatility exceeds a certain threshold, they must reduce their positions, whether they want to or not. DAT companies happen to be among the most volatile targets.

To use an inappropriate analogy, if ordinary tech companies are sitting in one boat, DAT companies are like tying two boats together—one sailing the waves of the stock market, the other struggling in the storm of the crypto market.

When both sides encounter bad weather at the same time, the impact they endure is not additive, but multiplicative.

Who Suffered Most, Who Was Most Resilient?

Looking at the previous trading day's DAT company losers list, you can clearly see a pattern: the smaller the company, the harder it fell.

Forward Industries fell 15.32%, with an mNAV of only 0.053. BTCS Inc. dropped 12.70%, Helius Medical Tech fell 12.91%.

These small companies with market caps under $100 millions could hardly find buyers amid the panic. In contrast, MicroStrategy, though the largest bitcoin holder, only fell 4.84%.

The logic behind this is simple: liquidity.

When panic hits, the bid-ask spread for small-cap stocks widens dramatically, and a slightly larger sell order can crash the stock price.

On this list, Tesla stands out. It dropped 5.06%, almost the smallest decline, but if you look at the data, its mNAV is as high as 985.96. This means the market values Tesla at nearly 1,000 times its crypto holdings.

That's because Tesla is essentially not a DAT company; holding crypto is just a side business. Investors buy Tesla for its electric vehicle business, and bitcoin price fluctuations have minimal impact on its valuation; the same logic applies to Coinbase, which fell 7.75%, but as an exchange, it has real fee income.

In contrast, for those pure DAT companies, the situation is completely different.

MicroStrategy's mNAV is only 1.28x, almost trading at its crypto holdings value. Galaxy Digital's mNAV is 5.49x, MARA Holdings is 1.29x. The market values these companies basically at their crypto asset value plus a slight premium. When the crypto market crashes, they have no other business to cushion the blow.

When a company's market cap is almost equal to its crypto asset holdings (mNAV close to 1), it means the market believes the company has no added value beyond holding crypto.

Bitmine's mNAV is 0.98, American Bitcoin hasn't disclosed but is estimated to be very low as well. These companies have essentially become bitcoin ETFs in the guise of listed companies.

The question is, now that there are real bitcoin ETFs to buy, why would investors still hold these companies as an indirect way?

This may explain why, during panic, these low mNAV companies fell even more. They bear both crypto asset risk and stock market risk, yet provide no additional value.

In a few hours, the US stock market will open. After a weekend cooling-off period, will market sentiment improve? Will those small DAT companies that fell over 10% continue to be sold off, or will bargain hunters step in?

From the data, companies with mNAV below 1 may present oversold opportunities, but they could also be value traps. After all, when a business model itself is in question, being cheap may not be a reason to buy.