Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesEarnWeb3SquareMore
Trade
Spot
Buy and sell crypto with ease
Margin
Amplify your capital and maximize fund efficiency
Onchain
Going Onchain, without going Onchain!
Convert & block trade
Convert crypto with one click and zero fees
Explore
Launchhub
Gain the edge early and start winning
Copy
Copy elite trader with one click
Bots
Simple, fast, and reliable AI trading bot
Trade
USDT-M Futures
Futures settled in USDT
USDC-M Futures
Futures settled in USDC
Coin-M Futures
Futures settled in cryptocurrencies
Explore
Futures guide
A beginner-to-advanced journey in futures trading
Futures promotions
Generous rewards await
Overview
A variety of products to grow your assets
Simple Earn
Deposit and withdraw anytime to earn flexible returns with zero risk
On-chain Earn
Earn profits daily without risking principal
Structured Earn
Robust financial innovation to navigate market swings
VIP and Wealth Management
Premium services for smart wealth management
Loans
Flexible borrowing with high fund security
How crypto-native leverage drove Bitcoin sell-off while ETFs barely flinched

How crypto-native leverage drove Bitcoin sell-off while ETFs barely flinched

CryptoSlateCryptoSlate2025/10/18 04:06
By:Gino Matos

JPMorgan attributes the recent Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) sell-off to crypto-native leverage rather than institutional exits, noting that spot ETFs and CME futures absorbed minimal forced selling while perpetual futures markets faced sharp deleveraging across both assets.

Bitcoin fell 13.1% from $122,316 on Oct. 3 to $106,329 by Oct. 17, while perpetual open interest dropped from approximately $70 billion to $58 billion on Oct. 10. This $12 billion decline signals forced liquidations rather than orderly position exits.

Farside Investors’ data shows that Bitcoin spot ETFs recorded $70.4 million in net outflows concentrated on Oct. 14, 15, and 16, minimal compared to the scale of the price move and the leverage flush in derivatives markets.

Ethereum saw even more severe deleveraging relative to its market size. Perpetual open interest fell from roughly $28 billion to between $19 billion and $20 billion on Oct. 10, representing a $9 billion to $10 billion drop.

Ethereum spot ETFs recorded $668.9 million in net outflows across Oct. 9, 10, 13, and 16, nearly 9.5 times Bitcoin ETF outflows, with concentrated redemptions on Oct. 10 and Oct. 13.

Despite the larger institutional response in Ethereum ETFs, JPMorgan concluded that perpetual futures deleveraging drove price action in both assets, with ETF flows showing “little forced selling” relative to the derivatives cascade.

The data support the bank’s thesis. Ethereum’s open interest declined by roughly 35%, while Bitcoin’s fell by approximately 17%. However, both assets experienced a coordinated sell-off on Oct. 10 as leverage unwound across crypto-native venues.

Metric Window (UTC) BTC ETH Notes
US spot ETF net flows (US$m) Oct 3–16, 2025 +3,406.9 +745.9 Sum of Farside daily “Total” for each date; Oct. 17 shows no entry.
CME futures OI variation Oct 9 → Oct 10, 2025 ~flat to low-single-digit dip down; heavier than BTC Coverage indicates CME BTC OI stayed broadly stable during the flush, while ETH saw more unwinding; exact daily CME OI deltas aren’t published.
Aggregate perp OI change (notional) Oct 10–11, 2025 (24–48h) ≈ −40% ≈ −40% Market-wide deleveraging across perpetuals per Kaiko/JPMorgan; aligns with contemporaneous reporting.

Perpetual flush mechanics

Perpetual futures exaggerate moves because leverage forces trades. When prices break, margin ratios slip, and exchanges liquidate under-margined positions with market orders that hit thin books and trigger reflexive cascades.

Cross-margin amplifies the dynamic, as collateral marked to market shrinks as the asset falls, forcing accounts that appeared safe to breach maintenance thresholds and add more forced flow.

Funding rates offer the fastest tell. During a down flush, perpetuals typically flip to sustained negative rates with the perpetual trading at a discount to the spot index.

The turn arrives when funding grinds back toward zero while the perpetual premium or discount closes, ideally with price stabilizing on rising spot volume rather than perpetual activity alone.

Open interest provides the second pillar. A sharp drop in aggregate open interest alongside the sell-off means leverage left the system instead of rotating to new shorts.

Bitcoin’s 17% decline and Ethereum’s 35% decline in open interest both point to genuine deleveraging.

A constructive rebuild is slow and spot-led. Prices recover or remain at the base level while open interest rises modestly, funding stays near flat, and the perpetual basis remains tight.

A durable bottom after a perpetual flush looks like negative funding reverting toward zero, the perpetual discount closing, open interest resetting and rebuilding gradually, and the futures curve lifting back into mild contango.

The post How crypto-native leverage drove Bitcoin sell-off while ETFs barely flinched appeared first on CryptoSlate.

0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

PoolX: Earn new token airdrops
Lock your assets and earn 10%+ APR
Lock now!

You may also like

Bitcoin Needs Just 15% Pump to Trigger $17B Short Squeeze

Bitcoin only needs a 15% move upward to liquidate $17B in shorts, setting the stage for a potential explosive short squeeze.$17 Billion in Shorts at Risk as BTC Nears Critical LevelWhy the Market Is Watching CloselyIs a Short Squeeze Imminent?

Coinomedia2025/10/19 04:39
Bitcoin Needs Just 15% Pump to Trigger $17B Short Squeeze