Robinhood meme stock punters denied class suit certification
Investors pursuing legal action against Robinhood over trading restrictions imposed in early 2021 have faced another setback after the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida rejected a request for class certification by the plaintiffs on Nov. 13, 2023.
Chief Judge Cecilia Altonaga said that after thoroughly considering the written submissions, record and relevant law, the plaintiffs’ motion was rejected because they could not persuade the court that issues of individualized reliance would not be prevalent.
Robinhood is a platform that provides commission-free trading for stocks, exchange-traded funds, options and cryptocurrencies. Users can trade these financial instruments via its app or website without incurring traditional fees.
The plaintiffs aimed to certify a class asserting market manipulation claims under federal securities laws against Robinhood markets, Robinhood Financial and Robinhood Securities.
The lawsuit centers on accusations of market manipulation by Robinhood, stemming from its trading limitations in early 2021 during the “meme stock” short squeeze . Heightened market volatility in January 2021 led regulators to increase deposit requirements for clearing brokers, including Robinhood, to mitigate the risks associated with unexecuted trades.
Robinhood could not meet the increased deposit requirements and pursued an alternative solution to satisfy regulators. Regulators granted a waiver for the deposit requirements contingent on Robinhood implementing restrictions on its customers’ ability to trade specific stocks.
The platform attributed its restrictions to market volatility, vehemently denying any liquidity issues. Plaintiffs claim the platform manipulated the market by imposing restrictions, presenting “half-truths” about volatility while conveniently omitting any acknowledgment of liquidity challenges.
Related: Cathie Wood’s ARK bags 1.1M Robinhood shares in one day
Robinhood urged the court to reject class certification, citing deficiencies in the class representatives and asserting that individualized issues of reliance and damages will overshadow common concerns. The plaintiffs contended that their representatives are sufficient, and the case is suitable for class certification.
The court acknowledged that, for the most part, the plaintiffs have shown that the case and their representatives are suitable for class treatment. However, they could not persuade the court that issues of individualized reliance would not be prevalent.
Magazine: Blockchain games aren’t really decentralized… but that’s about to change
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Florida teens arrested in connection with a kidnapping and theft of $4M in crypto
Share link:In this post: Three Florida teens have been accused of kidnapping a man at gunpoint and forcing him to transfer $4 million worth of digital assets to them. The teens kidnapped the victim from Las Vegas and threatened to kill him and his father if he didn’t cooperate. Law enforcement agencies across the globe are now warning individuals with substantial crypto holdings to be cautious amid a rise in kidnappings.
UK icons slam AI ‘theft’ in fiery plea to Starmer before key vote
Share link:In this post: Over 400 UK artists urged PM, Keir Starmer, to strengthen copyright laws ahead of an AI legislation vote. UK government’s proposed “opt-out” rule for AI training on copyrighted content faces strong backlash. Hayao Miyazaki and others condemn AI-generated art, fueling copyright debates and legal challenges.
Americans have wiped out $3 trillion in savings in the past 3 years, mostly from stimulus checks
Share link:In this post: Americans have drained $3 trillion in savings since 2021, with excess savings now at negative $900 billion. The US savings rate dropped to 3.9% in March, below pre-pandemic levels of 5-6%. Consumer spending rose 0.7% in March, but GDP still shrank by 0.3% due to soaring imports.

Banking the unbanked, but this time for real?
Trending news
MoreCrypto prices
More








