Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesEarnWeb3SquareMore
Trade
Spot
Buy and sell crypto with ease
Margin
Amplify your capital and maximize fund efficiency
Onchain
Going Onchain, without going Onchain!
Convert
Zero fees, no slippage
Explore
Launchhub
Gain the edge early and start winning
Copy
Copy elite trader with one click
Bots
Simple, fast, and reliable AI trading bot
Trade
USDT-M Futures
Futures settled in USDT
USDC-M Futures
Futures settled in USDC
Coin-M Futures
Futures settled in cryptocurrencies
Explore
Futures guide
A beginner-to-advanced journey in futures trading
Futures promotions
Generous rewards await
Overview
A variety of products to grow your assets
Simple Earn
Deposit and withdraw anytime to earn flexible returns with zero risk
On-chain Earn
Earn profits daily without risking principal
Structured Earn
Robust financial innovation to navigate market swings
VIP and Wealth Management
Premium services for smart wealth management
Loans
Flexible borrowing with high fund security
No More Blanket Account Freezes in India’s Crypto Fraud Cases

No More Blanket Account Freezes in India’s Crypto Fraud Cases

CoineditionCoinedition2024/09/15 16:00
By:Nynu V Jamal
  • An Indian High Court rules that investigation agencies cannot freeze an entire bank account during a probe.
  • The court directed the police to freeze only the specific amount related to the crypto fraud.
  • The petitioner granted access to his bank account on the condition he maintains a minimum balance of an approximate $2,990.

An Indian High Court has reined in on nonchalant account freezes declaring that investigative agencies cannot freeze entire bank accounts during crypto fraud investigations.

The court’s decision comes on the heels of a recent crypto-fraud case where a petitioner’s account was entirely frozen. Considering the inconveniences and hardships caused by such moves, the court mandated that investigative agencies can only freeze the specific amount linked to the fraud; not the entire account.

Mohammed Saifullah, an HDFC Bank account holder in Tiruvallur district, filed a petition after his account was frozen by the Telangana State Cyber Security Bureau (TSCSB). The freeze, related to a cryptocurrency fraud investigation, lasted over a year. While Saifullah was unaware of the reason, the bank’s counsel informed the court it stemmed from an investigation initiated in May 2023.

At the time, Saifullah’s account held around ₹9.69 lakh (approximately $11,680).

Read also: India’s Crypto Market to Expand: Two More Global Exchanges to Get Approval

Court’s Stance on Account Freezes

Justice G. Jayachandran argued that freezing an entire account jeopardizes individuals’ livelihoods and financial stability. The judge added that account holders were left in the dark on the reasons for the account suspension. By the time they become aware, their daily financial activities and business operations may have already been significantly disrupted. He added:

“No doubt, the statutes empower the investigation agencies to request the bank concerned to freeze the accounts pending investigation and intimate it forthwith to the jurisdictional courts, but whether the power is properly exercised or not is the moot question now looming large.”

In the ruling favoring Saifullah, Justice Jayachandran ordered that he be granted access to his account, subject to the condition that he maintains a minimum balance of ₹2.48 lakh (approximately $2,990), which is the amount currently under investigation. The court further ruled against any future orders to freeze entire bank accounts for investigations.

The judge referenced Section 102 of the Criminal Procedure Code, and now Section 106 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), which require investigation agencies to notify in a timely manner the affected account holders and also report to courts on such freezes and closures. The judge noted that these provisions are often disregarded. Justice Jayachandran emphasized that the court frequently sees petitions to “defreeze” accounts due to agencies’ failure to communicate with the jurisdictional court. 

Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

PoolX: Locked for new tokens.
APR up to 10%. Always on, always get airdrop.
Lock now!

You may also like