Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesEarnWeb3SquareMore
Trade
Spot
Buy and sell crypto with ease
Margin
Amplify your capital and maximize fund efficiency
Onchain
Going Onchain, without going Onchain!
Convert
Zero fees, no slippage
Explore
Launchhub
Gain the edge early and start winning
Copy
Copy elite trader with one click
Bots
Simple, fast, and reliable AI trading bot
Trade
USDT-M Futures
Futures settled in USDT
USDC-M Futures
Futures settled in USDC
Coin-M Futures
Futures settled in cryptocurrencies
Explore
Futures guide
A beginner-to-advanced journey in futures trading
Futures promotions
Generous rewards await
Overview
A variety of products to grow your assets
Simple Earn
Deposit and withdraw anytime to earn flexible returns with zero risk
On-chain Earn
Earn profits daily without risking principal
Structured Earn
Robust financial innovation to navigate market swings
VIP and Wealth Management
Premium services for smart wealth management
Loans
Flexible borrowing with high fund security
Could Hyperliquid’s Actions in the JELLY Controversy Spark Another FTX-Like Collapse?

Could Hyperliquid’s Actions in the JELLY Controversy Spark Another FTX-Like Collapse?

BeInCryptoBeInCrypto2025/03/26 23:03
By:Kamina Bashir

Hyperliquid’s handling of the JELLY token manipulation incident has raised alarms about its risk control measures and ethical practices. Industry leaders fear it could follow in FTX's footsteps due to centralization, unethical actions, and vulnerabilities in its system design.

Hyperliquid (HYPE) is facing heightened scrutiny after a market manipulation incident involving the JELLY token. The platform’s response to the crisis has raised concerns about the effectiveness of its risk control mechanisms.

Some industry leaders are warning that Hyperliquid may be heading down a dangerous path, with comparisons being drawn to the collapse of FTX in 2022. This centralized exchange failed due to mismanagement and a lack of transparency.

Is Hyperliquid Headed for the Same Fate as FTX?

BeInCrypto reported that the controversy began when a trader executed a manipulation scheme, shorting the JELLY token and then pumping its price on-chain. This left the platform’s Hyperliquidity Provider (HLP) vault with an approximate $12 million loss. 

In response, Hyperliquid delisted JELLY to avoid a potential $230 million liability. It also settled positions at $0.0095, overriding the oracle price of $0.50.

While this mitigated the damage, it triggered widespread criticism. Gracy Chen, CEO of cryptocurrency exchange Bitget, called the move “immature, unethical, and unprofessional.”

“Hyperliquid may be on track to become FTX 2.0,” she claimed.

Chen highlighted that the recent incident has raised significant concerns about HyperLiquid’s integrity, with user losses casting doubt on the platform’s reliability. She also noted that Hyperliquid’s move sets a dangerous precedent for user trust.

“Despite presenting itself as an innovative decentralized exchange with a bold vision, Hyperliquid operates more like an offshore CEX with no KYC/AML, enabling illicit flows and bad actors,” Chen added.

She also criticized Hyperliquid’s product design. Chen stressed that flaws like mixed vaults expose users to systemic risk, and unlimited position sizes enable manipulation. If these issues aren’t addressed, the CEO warned, other altcoins could be weaponized against HyperLiquid, putting it at risk of becoming the next major collapse in crypto.

Interestingly, in April 2023, Hyperliquid CEO Jeff Yan raised similar alarms about Bitget.

“Bitget may be the next FTX,” he posted.

In a series of tweets, Yan highlighted his concerns about Bitget’s operations and ethical issues. He criticized the platform for dishonesty in its matching engine. Yan claimed that Bitget masquerades as an order book exchange while secretly using a different structure behind the scenes, which he believed is unethical and possibly illegal. 

The Hyperliquid co-founder detailed how Bitget allegedly profited from retail taker flow and copy trading, particularly by manipulating orders. He stressed that exchanges like Bitget should not receive additional funding, as the crypto industry deserves more transparency and ethical behavior. 

“Even if it’s better now, the ethical concerns still stand. I wouldn’t touch the exchange with a 10 foot pole,” Yan remarked.

Nonetheless, the tides have now turned, with Hyperliquid being the subject of industry criticism. On-chain investigator ZachXBT revealed that Hyperliquid appeared indifferent to North Korean hackers using stolen funds to open positions on the platform. Yet, they acted swiftly in the JELLY incident. 

“When it’s Radiant hack with DPRK funds (thousands of victims) they claim they can’t do anything and were notified in a timely manner. When it’s a low cap PVP meme coin the couple of validators and huge % of stake is controlled by HL rush to close positions at an arbitrary price. Actual decentralization is still rare in this space,” he wrote.

Former BitMEX CEO Arthur Hayes echoed this centralization critique.

“HYPE can’t handle the JELLY. Let’s stop pretending hyperliquid is decentralized,” Hayes stated.

Meanwhile, the incident has also negatively impacted HYPE. It experienced double-digit losses after the incident. BeInCrypto data showed that HYPE’s value declined 7.8% over the past day. At press time, it was trading at $14.4.

Could Hyperliquid’s Actions in the JELLY Controversy Spark Another FTX-Like Collapse? image 0Hyperliquid (HYPE) Price Performance. Source: BeInCrypto

Not only the price, but the Total Value Locked (TVL) has also taken a hit. According to the data from DefiLama, HLP’s TVL dropped by approximately 32.3% from $287.8 million on Wednesday to $194.8 million today. 

0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

PoolX: Locked for new tokens.
APR up to 10%. Always on, always get airdrop.
Lock now!