Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesEarnWeb3SquareMore
Trade
Spot
Buy and sell crypto with ease
Margin
Amplify your capital and maximize fund efficiency
Onchain
Going Onchain, without going Onchain!
Convert
Zero fees, no slippage
Explore
Launchhub
Gain the edge early and start winning
Copy
Copy elite trader with one click
Bots
Simple, fast, and reliable AI trading bot
Trade
USDT-M Futures
Futures settled in USDT
USDC-M Futures
Futures settled in USDC
Coin-M Futures
Futures settled in cryptocurrencies
Explore
Futures guide
A beginner-to-advanced journey in futures trading
Futures promotions
Generous rewards await
Overview
A variety of products to grow your assets
Simple Earn
Deposit and withdraw anytime to earn flexible returns with zero risk
On-chain Earn
Earn profits daily without risking principal
Structured Earn
Robust financial innovation to navigate market swings
VIP and Wealth Management
Premium services for smart wealth management
Loans
Flexible borrowing with high fund security
Bank of America Ordered To Pay $540,261,499 for Massive Underpayment of Deposit Insurance Fees

Bank of America Ordered To Pay $540,261,499 for Massive Underpayment of Deposit Insurance Fees

Daily HodlDaily Hodl2025/04/17 16:00
By:by Henry Kanapi

Bank of America is set to pay more than half a billion dollars after a district judge found the lender massively underpaid its deposit insurance fees for more than a year.

In 2017, the FDIC filed a lawsuit against BofA for allegedly  failing to pay $1.12 billion in mandatory fees between Q2 of 2013 and Q4 of 2014.

The FDIC also accused BofA of unjustly enriching itself by keeping the money.

According to the lawsuit, BofA failed to accurately report its counterparty exposures, leading to lower risk scores and lower insurance payments.

“In 2016, an FDIC audit revealed that ‘[BofA] had not consolidated its counterparty exposures to the ultimate parent level as required…’ This lowered [BofA’s] concentration measure, which in turn considerably lowered the overall amount that BANA paid in assessments for those quarters.”

BofA argues that it correctly interpreted regulations that were created after the 2008 financial crisis to strengthen the stability of the banking system and enhance risk-based deposit insurance assessments.

The bank also claims it lacked fair notice of the FDIC’s interpretation of the rule, calling the rule itself “arbitrary and capricious and procedurally flawed.”

US District Judge Loren L. Alikhan rejected most of BofA’s arguments while cutting the claim in half.

According to Alikhan, the rule is valid and that the FDIC was right to go after BofA’s underpaid deposit insurance fees. However, the judge says BofA has to pay over $540.26 million plus interest instead of the $1.12 billion sought by the regulator.

“The court agrees with the FDIC that, after reading the text of the 2011 Rule and ‘acting in good faith,’ [BofA] should have been able to ‘identify[] with ascertainable certainty, the standards’ it was expected to apply.” 

Follow us on X , Facebook and Telegram

Don't Miss a Beat – Subscribe to get email alerts delivered directly to your inbox

Check Price Action

Surf The Daily Hodl Mix

Generated Image: Midjourney

0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

PoolX: Locked for new tokens.
APR up to 10%. Always on, always get airdrop.
Lock now!