Michael Saylor calls onchain proof-of-reserves a ‘bad idea,’ rules it out for Strategy over security concerns
Quick Take Michael Saylor argued that publishing onchain proof-of-reserves is a “bad idea” that could pose security threats to Strategy. He argued that publishing wallet addresses means exposing sensitive information, which could create security vulnerabilities. Saylor added that providing proof of reserves often ignores liabilities, making it insufficient for assessing financial health.

Responding to a question on whether Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) has any plans to publish onchain proof-of-reserves during a sideline event ahead of Bitcoin 2025 in Las Vegas on Monday night, the company's co-founder and executive chairman, Michael Saylor, said it posed security threats.
Many crypto firms broadly adopted proof-of-reserve measures after FTX's collapse to demonstrate onchain holdings for transparency. However, critics argue the approach falls short — often omitting audited fiat reserves, liabilities, and other key data needed to assess a firm's full financial health.
Saylor said that while the crypto industry learned from FTX's failure, he was unsure it had learned the things that the institutional community needs going forward, arguing that the current way to publish proof of reserves is insecure. "It actually dilutes the security of the issuer, the custodians, the exchanges, and the investors. It's not a good idea. It's a bad idea," he said. "It's like publishing the address and the bank accounts of all your kids and your phone numbers of all your kids, and then thinking somehow that makes your family better. It doesn't make your family better."
Saylor suggested that no institutional grade or enterprise security analyst would recommend publicly sharing wallet addresses, as it enables full traceability of past and future transactions. Ask any AI to list the risks, and you'll get a book's worth of vulnerabilities, he claimed.
"You publish your wallet, that's an attack vector for hackers, nation-state actors, every type of troll imaginable," Saylor said. "And it creates so much liability that you should think twice before you do it. It's okay at a small level, but really, it isn't God's gift. I think people give too much credence to it on X."
Missing the other half of the equation
The Strategy co-founder also picked up on the lack of the liabilities side of the equation. "If you really want crypto security and you're maxi about this, my suggestion is buy bitcoin, self-custody your bitcoin. It's pretty freaking obvious, right? You should own the bitcoin yourself if that's what you want," Saylor said. "[But,] if you're going to be a securities investor, if you invest in securities, what you want is an institutional-grade proof of assets and proof of liabilities with them netted out. And the best practice is not to publish the wallet."
He argued that the gold standard for a bitcoin treasury company like Strategy is a Big Four auditor verifying both asset ownership and liabilities, ensuring no rehypothecation of bitcoin or hidden obligations and the results should be signed off by a public company's CFO, CEO, and board — all legally accountable under U.S. law — as Strategy does. "It's much better than simply a proof of reserves wallet," he said.
Institutional investors care far more about audited financials than proof of reserves — they want 10Ks, 10Qs, and legal accountability, not just a wallet balance, Saylor continued. In public markets, missing a 10K is a massive red flag while publishing a wallet means little without knowing the liabilities, and proof of reserves alone won't protect you from a meltdown, he said.
Could zero-knowledge proofs help?
Saylor said he was open to implementing proof of reserves at some point if it could be done with zero-knowledge proofs that fully obscure wallet addresses. But even then, it would need to be cleared with custodians, exchanges, auditors, risk managers, and the company's directors to ensure there are no security gaps, and it still ignores the liabilities side, he said.
"Publishing a simple wallet that you can track is really just a crypto parlor trick. I get why people like it, and it's interesting if you have an exchange," he added. "But let me tell you the real lesson you should learn from FTX and Mt. Gox is, don't do business with shaky offshore exchanges run by juvenile tweakers. If you're a crypto person, hold your own crypto."
On Monday, Strategy announced it had purchased another 4,020 bitcoins for about $427.1 million at an average price of $106,237 per bitcoin. Strategy now holds a total of 580,250 BTC — worth over $63.5 billion — bought at an average price of $69,979 per bitcoin for a total cost of around $40.6 billion. That's the equivalent of more than 2.7% of bitcoin's total 21 million supply and implies around $23 billion of paper gains.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Trump’s Tariffs Ruled Illegal, Markets Breathe a Sigh of Relief
Elon Musk wraps up White House role, affirms DOGE’s ongoing journey
Share link:In this post: Elon Musk stepped down as head of DOGE because he reached the legal work limit. Musk said DOGE saved $175 billion, but some people questioned the real savings. Musk wants to focus on Tesla and SpaceX now and leave politics behind.
XBTO attains UAE license to offer digital asset custody and investment services
Share link:In this post: XBTO license in the UAE will allow it to offer crypto investment and custody services. The company is also seeking a license in the UK. XBTO was a participant in Abu Dhabi’s Hub71.

Bitget Adds B/USD1 Trading Pair. Come and grab a share of 80,428 B!
Trending news
MoreCrypto prices
More








