$13.5B in ETH Burned, But Why Is Ethereum’s Supply Still Growing?

While Ethereum is often touted as a potentially deflationary asset, the reality of the protocol tells a different story. Nearly 4.6 million ETH have been burned since 2021, equivalent to 13.5 billion dollars, without halting the growth of supply. An anomaly that questions the coherence and effectiveness of the economic model established since the London upgrade, and challenges certain certainties about the programmed scarcity of the asset.

A Massive Burn Mechanism, but Limited Effect on Supply

Since the implementation of EIP-1559 on August 5, 2021, the Ethereum network has introduced a major monetary innovation: the automatic destruction of a portion of transaction fees, or “burn”, intended to reduce inflationary pressure on the ETH supply, while the crypto has just crossed 3,000 $ .

In 1,438 days, this mechanism has allowed burning 4.6 million ETH , about 13.57 billion dollars at the current market value. This represents an average of 2.22 ETH burned each minute, and this figure remains strongly correlated with the level of activity on the blockchain.

The applications and uses responsible for the majority of burned ETH are well identified. Here are the main contributors, according to ultrasound.money data :

• Regular ETH transactions: 375,959 ETH burned;
• Opensea (NFT): 230,051 ETH sent to burn;
• Uniswap V2 (DEX): 227,045 ETH destroyed;
• Tether (USDT) transfers: 210,070 ETH burned.

This monetary mechanism, praised for its transparency and simplicity, nevertheless fails to compensate for the amount of newly issued ETH. The burn closely depends on the level of network usage: the more transactions there are, the greater the amount of ETH destroyed.

Conversely, during periods of lower activity, the mechanism shows its limits. The expected effect, reducing the overall supply, is therefore partially offset by issuance still exceeding total burn since 2021.

Moderate but Persistent Inflation: The Ethereum Paradox

Despite this massive destruction, the Ethereum network continues to issue more ETH than it burns. Thus, 3,695,537 ETH have been created since the London hard fork, injecting about 10.89 billion dollars of additional value into the ecosystem.

The median annual inflation rate over the period reaches 0.801%, a level nearly equivalent to that of Bitcoin today (0.809%) , although significantly lower than Ethereum’s former Proof-of-Work model, which would have generated an inflation of 3.394%.

This gap between burn and monetary creation reveals a policy in unstable balance. However, the most recent weekly data show a slight inflection: over seven days, the emission rate dropped to 0.723%, with 16,745 newly created ETH.

This evolution seems linked to a decrease in network activity, and thus less pressure on the burn. Contrary to the popular idea that Ethereum is becoming “deflationary”, the reality is much more nuanced. The balance between burn and creation strongly depends on transaction volume and the network’s use by decentralized applications.

In the short term, this controlled inflation may appear as a viable compromise, guaranteeing sufficient incentives for validators while limiting dilution for holders. However, in the long term, maintaining an inflationary supply, even moderate, could pose problems if the burn does not keep pace during periods of low activity. It remains to be seen whether the protocol will adjust its economic parameters or rely on the ecosystem’s organic growth to sustainably reverse the trend.