Prix de ComedianBAN

🤔 Why Ripple vs SEC Lawsuit Could Finally End in 2025 The long-running Ripple vs SEC battle might finally be wrapping up this year. With settlement talks and a critical SEC meeting this week, the stakes are higher than ever for XRP. Here’s a quick rundown of where things stand, what’s next, and why this week could be crucial for XRP. 🔸 2024 – SEC Files For an Appeal To the Second Circuit Last year, the SEC had filed an appeal to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, challenging a federal judge’s ruling that Ripple’s programmatic sales of XRP to retail customers did not violate securities laws, while institutional sales did. 🔸 January 15, 2025 – SEC Files Opening Brief To Overturn the 2023 Ruling At the start of 2025, the SEC filed an opening brief on January 15th, in its appeal against Ripple, seeking to overturn the 2023 ruling that classified XRP sales differently for institutional and retail investors. The SEC claims all XRP sales should count as unregistered securities, arguing that Ripple’s marketing created profit expectations. However, Ripple’s legal chief, Stuart Alderoty, brushed it off as old arguments which would be dropped by the next administration. 🔸 March 19, 2025 – Both the parties drop appeals On March 19th this year, the SEC dropped its appeal against Ripple Labs regarding the legal status of the XRP token. This marked a significant regulatory shift for the crypto industry under the new administration. Although Ripple scored a win on public sales, but it had to pay a $125 million fine as the court still held that institutional sales of XRP did violate securities laws. 🔸 May 8, 2025 – $50 Million Deal Finalised Ripple and the SEC finally settled their long-running legal battle on May 8, 2025, agreeing to a $50 million deal. The deal was followed after months of appeals and negotiations. Ripple got a reduced penalty and the case ended on a favorable terms. Both the parties also asked the court for an indicative ruling to lift the ban on XRP sales and to release the $125 million penalty held in escrow. Of that amount, $50 million would go to the SEC, and the rest back to Ripple. 🔸 May 15, 2025 – Judge Torres Denies Request For Indicative Ruling But in a recent update, Judge Torres denied SEC’s request to lift the ban on XRP sales to big investors and to lower Ripple’s $125 million fine. After this, XRP’s price dropped from $2.65 on May 14 to $2.30 on May 17. Judge Torres called it “procedurally improper” and was not done in the right way. However, Ripple’s CLO, Stuart Alderoty pointed out that nothing in the court order affects Ripple’s recent wins—like XRP not being classified as a security and the issue was purely procedural. Fred Rispoli also shared that this will get resolved, but Ripple and the SEC will need 2-3 weeks to prepare and file their motion, followed by another week or two for the judge to make a decision. 🔸 What’s Next? Investors now await the SEC’s next move, a new settlement request that follows the court’s rules. The SEC needs to clearly show that lifting the ban on XRP sales and lowering the fine will benefit both big investors and the public. Legal Expert Bill Morgan shared a quick timeline on on what could be next. After another three steps, the case could be fully closed. Right now, Ripple and the SEC are preparing to file a new motion with the correct legal steps. If the court agrees for an indicative ruling, they’ll ask the Appeals Court to send the case back to Judge Torres so she can approve the agreed relief. Once the Appeals Court agrees, Ripple and the SEC will officially ask Judge Torres to lift the injunction and reduce the fine as they agreed. After the injunction is lifted and Ripple pays the $50 million fine, both sides will ask the Appeals Court to dismiss the ongoing appeals, which will officially close the case. This week could bring clarity to the Ripple case, with a closed SEC meeting set for Thursday, May 22. A favorable ruling could clear up things for XRP ETF as well. #XRP #Ripple

I magine a world where every post you share, every follower you gain, and every piece of content you create belongs to you—not Facebook, Instagram, or TikTok. That’s the promise of Web3 social media. In today’s Web2 world, traditional platforms control everything. They can delete your content, ban your account, change the algorithm, or take a cut from your earnings—whenever they want. You're not the customer. You’re the product. Enter Lens Protocol and Farcaster—Web3-based social networks that flip the script. These platforms are built on blockchain technology, which means: Your identity is yours. No one can deplatform you. Your followers follow you, not the platform. If you move to another app built on the same protocol, your audience comes with you. You can monetize directly. Your content is an asset—mint it, sell it, or reward your community without middlemen. Think of it as Instagram, but you own the keys. Web3 social platforms empower creators by: Removing platform censorship Letting fans truly support creators through tips, tokens, and NFTs Providing portable profiles, like a passport for your digital life This is the creator economy 2.0. No more gatekeepers. No more algorithm anxiety. Just real ownership, real freedom, and real connection.

BLOCKCHAIN FORK: A Blockchain akwai wani abu da ake yawan magana akai wanda ake kira da "Blockchain fork". Me yake nufi sannan kuma ya yake gudana!? Da farko dai ya kamata mu san cewa shi wannan FORK ɗin ya rabu ne zuwa gida biyu: 1. Muna da Hard fork. 2. Da kuma Soft fork. insha'Allah A wannan rubutun zanyi bayani akan dukkan wannan abubuwan a takaice. Muje zuwa! Hard fork: Abun da ake nufi da HARD fork shine Tsari wanda Blockchain Developers suke bi wajan canza complete CODE na wata Blockchain ɗin su ƙirƙiri wata sabuwar Blockchain a gefe. Yin yana zai basu damar gina wata sabuwar Blockchain, data ƙunshi duk wasu abubuwa da wancan take dashi, sannan su ƙara mata wasu abubuwan da ita wannan ainihin Blockchain bata dashi. Yadda abun yake shine: ko wace Blockchain daka sani a Duniyar Indai Public ce (Ma'ana an gina ta saboda Al'umma) Misali Irin su: BITCOIN BLOCKCHAIN, ETHEREUM, SOLANA, TRON. Duka irin wadannan Public Blockchain ne. Kuma duk wani tsari da aka bi wajan gina su yana kasan cewa "Open source" (Ma'ana a buɗe yake). Kowa zai iya zuwa ya kalla, kowa zai iya installing wannan CODE ɗin akan Computer sa, sannan kuma kowa zai iya kwafa yaje ya gina irin shi. Haka zalika Devs zasu iya Translating wannan CODE ɗin ma. Kawai abu ɗaya ne mutun bazai iya yi ba, shine ya canza wani abun a cikin ainihin CODE. To shi "Hard fork" kamar yadda nayi bayani a sama: Developers suna ɗaukar wannan CODE ɗin ne, su rubuta shi yadda yake, sannan ka ƙara ko kuma su cire wasu abubuwan da suke ganin bai yi musu ba, kuma su saka abun da suke ganin yayi musu. Shikkenan sai suyi lunching wata sabuwar Blockchain ɗin, Wadda bata da halaka da wancan Blockchain ɗin. Irin wannan HARD FORK ɗin Yana faruwa ba iya sai lallai akan Blockchain ba. Koda akan PROTOCOLS ko DEX. Kamar misali: Ya faru da UNISWAP, lokacin da aka gina SUSHISWAP an kwafi CODE ɗin UNISWAP ne aka gina SUSHISWAP, sai ya kasan ce sun ɗora wasu New features wanda babu su a uniswap. Kamar dai da suka gina tasu a matsayin Multichain DEX. Duk irin wannan yana faru, kaina zaka iya ɗaukar CODE ɗin da aka Gina MAKERDAO kayi building wani wanda ya fishi. Wannan tsarin zai kasan ce kayi FORKING MarkaDoa ne. Halaƙar da zata kasan ce tsakanin su kawai itace, kayi kwafi idea su wajan yin ta, Kuma a tsarin Decentralization babu wani "copyright", don kaje ka kwafi wani abu da yake Decentralised babu wanda zai kama ka, ko kuma ya ɗaureka. Idan har aka kama akan haka, hakan yana nufin akwai wanda yake da iko akan Blockchain ɗin idan har kuma akwai wanda yake da iko ko Mallakin Blockchain to wannan Blockchain ɗin ba Decentralised ba ce!😊. Ina fatan An gane wannan😄. Dalilin da yake kawo "HARD FORK" na Blockchain shine: A wasu lokutan, ana iya samun ban Bancin ra'ayi tsakanin Developers da suke aiki akan Blockchain. A samu wasu mutanen suna buƙatar a ƙirƙiri wani abu da babu shi akan Blockchain ɗin. Su kuma wasu basu buƙatar komai sunfi so a barta a hakan da take, tsarin yayi musu. To a wannan lokacin, wanda suke buƙatar wani abun da ba'a saka ba. Sune zasu gudanar da Wannan Hard fork din. Za su ɗauki code ɗin wannan Blockchain ɗin suje suyi editing ɗinshi su ƙara abubuwan da suke buƙata. sai suyi lunching sabuwar Blockchain. Wadda maybe zata kunshi komai da wancan take dashi, maybe kuma su cire wasu abubuwa. sannan kuma sai su ƙara zuba wasu abubuwan da wancan bata saka ba. Misalin HARD FORK: 1. BITCOIN CASH (BCH) Blockchain: Wannan Blockchain ɗin itace akayi HARD FORK ɗinta da BITCOIN Blockchain. Kamar yadda nayi muku Bayani yadda hard fork yake aiki, sun ɗauki CODE ɗin BITCOIN ne sukayi Editing ɗinshi, ta hanyar cire wasu abubuwan da ƙara wasu abubuwan. Sannan sukayi Lunching ɗinta. Sunyi haka ne domin ƙara wa Blockchain ɗin BITCOIN sauri da kuma bada damar yin "START CONTRACT". Fatan kun gane!? Wani Misalin na project da sukayi HARD FORK akwai irin su: ETHEREUM CLASSIC (ETC). BITCOIN GOLD (BTG). Duka waɗannan HARD FORK ɗinsu akai daga wata Blockchain ɗin.. Ita yanzu wannan Blockchain ɗin bata da haɗi da BITCOIN, tsarin "CONSENSUS MECHANISMS" da duk wani abu da suke Amfani dashi, sune suka tsaka kayan su. Sannan kuma COIN ɗin da suke Amfani dashi $BCH shima nasu ne, wanda sune suka ware Masa Total supply da komai da komai. Da fatan An fahimci HARD FORK!? Bari mu cigaba... SOFT Fork: Shi kuma wannan Tsari ne da ake kawo wa kan Blockchain domin Upgrading ɗin ta. Dole zai kasan ce abun da aka kawo ɗin bai saɓawa asalin abun da aka shirya akan Blockchain ɗin ba. Mun sani cewa idan aka shirya abu akan Blockchain ba'a taɓa canza shi. Sannan kuma ba'a taɓa gyara shi (Editing). Shi Soft fork kawai wani Abu ake kawowa Network ɗin wanda be saɓawa Network ɗin ba, kuma sai ya zamana "Majority" na mutanen dake kan Blockchain ɗin sun gamsu dashi sannan zai kasan ce alive. Wannan shine bayani a takaice akan HARD FORK da SOFT FORK. Idan ka ƙaru kayi sharing zuwa gaba, domin wasu su Amfana! Thanks.

At a time when cryptocurrencies are establishing themselves as a major lever of individual financial sovereignty, the United Kingdom has decided to tighten its grip. From 2026, every transaction will be scrutinized, every user identified. Anonymity, the cornerstone of the crypto ecosystem, is wavering under the battering ram of tax regulations. Starting in 2026, the British government will require that every crypto transaction be accompanied by a detailed set of personal data. The stated goal: to enhance transparency and combat tax evasion. In reality, this initiative marks the beginning of an era of systematic surveillance: This infrastructure aligns with the OECD’s Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework, turning every actor in the blockchain into a relay for the tax administration. This shift initiates a radical break with the founding values championed by Bitcoin, then extended to Web3: decentralization, pseudonymity, and financial autonomy. Crypto platforms operating in the United Kingdom will also have to adapt their technical architecture to incorporate this new reporting requirement. It is no longer simply about KYC, but about exhaustive and permanent transactional traceability . The slightest identification error could result in a £300 (356.94 €) fine per user, a penalty as deterrent as it is symptomatic of an authoritarian shift. The obligations also encompass commercial entities, trusts, and charitable organizations. For crypto providers, the challenges are colossal: This new paradigm could provoke an exodus of crypto companies towards less intrusive jurisdictions. Individual users will not be spared, as every wallet linked to a platform will have to be associated with a name, address, and tax number, even for minor transactions. The collateral effect is obvious: anonymity becomes a forbidden luxury. The promise of free digital sovereignty fades in favor of systematic control. Resisters, whether negligent or activist, will have to choose between a heavy fine or marginalization. For those who thought crypto offered refuge from hyper-surveillance by the state, the awakening is brutal: This regulation no longer targets only criminals; it targets the entire ecosystem by default. The United Kingdom is not an isolated case. The European Union is also preparing the post-anonymity era. From 2027, the AMLR will ban confidential cryptos and eliminate all anonymous wallets. In this context, the fantasy of a free and apolitical blockchain seems to collapse. This logic of “total transparency” raises a fundamental question: how far can states go without compromising fundamental freedoms? And above all, what space remains for truly independent crypto?

The legal entanglement between Ripple and the U.S. SEC took a new turn after Judge Analisa Torres denied a joint motion to modify the final judgment. This has raised serious questions about the future of their settlement. Meanwhile, Australian lawyer Bill Morgan has outlined six critical legal issues facing both parties. Notably, on May 8, Ripple and the SEC jointly filed a motion seeking to amend key terms of a previously agreed-upon settlement. This included lifting a permanent injunction on Ripple’s institutional XRP sales and reducing a $125 million civil penalty to $50 million. However, Judge Torres dismissed the motion on May 15, stating it failed to meet procedural standards under Rule 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which governs relief from final judgments. The motion had instead relied on Rule 62.1, which allows a judge to issue an indicative ruling when a case is under appeal. Judge Torres made it clear that the motion would still be denied even if jurisdiction were restored from the appellate court. Related: XRP Case Setback: Ripple-SEC Joint Motion Fails to Clear Court’s Procedural Bar Reacting to the development, attorney Morgan posted a detailed legal analysis on X. He identified six unanswered questions that now cloud the path forward for Ripple and the SEC. His reflections center on the validity of the settlement, procedural compliance, and the SEC’s internal governance. Among the most pressing concerns: Morgan suggests it’s “hard to believe” that experienced legal teams from both Ripple and the SEC would overlook such a critical procedural rule. This implies the use of Rule 62.1 may have been a calculated move to bypass the difficulty of proving “exceptional circumstances” under Rule 60. The failure of the joint motion means the $125 million penalty remains in place, and the ban on institutional XRP sales still stands, at least for now. Related: Ripple Can Now Access $400 Billion UAE Trade Zone With New DFSA Payment License Meanwhile, Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer, Stuart Alderoty, clarified that Judge Torres’ denial is procedural and does not affect Ripple’s prior legal victories, including the July 2023 ruling that XRP is not a security. He emphasized that Ripple and the SEC remain aligned in seeking resolution and plan to refile under the appropriate legal framework. Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.