Not Coin priceNOT

🔥 LIQUIDITY IS HUNTING MOMENTUM AGAIN 🔥 Traders 🚨 Market structure continues shifting into an ultra-selective environment where only a small group of assets attract aggressive futures flow. 📈 Expansion zone: $SUI | $ICP | $ONDO | $AEVO | $CORE | $EIGEN Each move is becoming more explosive — but also shorter-lived. Price action now behaves more like rapid momentum bursts rather than stable trend continuation. Meanwhile weaker rotations are already losing traction: $BLUR | $AR | $NOT | $PENGU The message from the market is becoming clear: Discipline and timing are outperforming emotional positioning ⚡📊 $SAHARA $STABLE $PARTI

🚨 SMC LONG Alert on $NOT! Institutional OB tapped at 4H Bullish FVG. 15m ChoCh (Bullish) confirmed. Full breakdown below 🧵👇 🟢 Direction: **LONG** | Asset: **NOT/USDT** 🎯 Entry: **0.000577** | SL: **-0.19%** 💰 TP1: **0.000605** | TP2: **0.000651** ⚖️ R/R: **24.93x** | Score: **100/100** 🔎 **SMC Breakdown:** 🔸 HTF POI: 4H Bullish FVG 🔸 LTF Confirm: 15m ChoCh (Bullish) 🔸 Entry Zone: 15m OB 🔸 Target Liq: BSL - Buy Side Liquidity 🔥 Are you in this $NOT setup? Let me know! 📌 Follow for high-RR SMC setups every single day 📈 #NVDA #TSLA

$NOT *🎮 NOT/USDT: GAME OVER OR RESPAWN LOADING? 🕹️📉* 📈 *Trend:* -6.40% on 1D 🔻, down -25% from 0.0007703 spike high. Now 0.0005775, bleeding after Telegram hype run 🧐 📊 *RSI:* 62.80 = Neutral-bullish ⚡, cooling from 84.63 overbought. Still above 60 = not dead yet, but momentum fading ✅ 🎯 *Level:* Below EMA200 (0.0006566) 🔻 but above EMA100 (0.0004620) 🛡️ Support: 0.0005667 / 0.0004620 🎯, Resistance: 0.0006230 / 0.0006566 🚧 💡 *Move:* 2.2x run from 0.0003437 base to 0.0007703 on 3.17B volume 📊, now distribution phase. Rejected by EMA200 = bears took control short term. Hold 0.0005667 = bounce to 0.0006230-0.0006566 possible 🏆. Lose 0.0005667 = EMA100 at 0.0004620 next 📉. 231K turnover = thin liquidity for a top 100 coin ⚠️. Not financial advice. DYOR! 👀💎

two questions worth asking about any DeFi protocol before depositing — how does it handle asset quality, and what happens to your funds if something goes wrong on the infrastructure side. STONFI has concrete answers to both. on asset quality, the protocol runs a two-tier model. curated assets — major tokens like TON, USDt, NOT, and STON, go through team review. projects seeking dedicated listings have historically needed to demonstrate commitment through liquidity locks, around 5,000 TON in paired liquidity locked for six months. that signals long-term intent rather than a quick launch and exit. the protocol is also permissionless. anyone can import a jetton contract address and create a pool without approval. these appear as community assets with explicit disclaimers and require users to enable visibility manually. the distinction is visible in the interface so you know which category you're looking at. tokens identified as fraudulent, honeypots, rugs, extreme fee tokens — get blacklisted at the interface level and cannot be swapped through the official app. advanced users can still interact via direct contract calls but the standard interface blocks them for regular users. on system reliability the track record is straightforward. pool contracts are immutable once deployed. router upgrades go through a seven day timelock. the v2 contracts were audited by trail of bits in january 2025 with findings addressed before deployment. CertiK skynet runs continuous real-time monitoring. an active bug bounty on hackenproof pays severity-based rewards for responsible disclosure. peak load on may 5th hit $40 million in daily volume at one swap every 0.73 seconds with no reported outages. $7.1 billion in cumulative volume processed with no protocol-level fund losses reported. immutable pools, timelocks, audits, and non-custodial design don't eliminate risk entirely. they reduce the attack surface significantly. $BTC $XAUT $BILL