VisionGame narxiVISION

RT @CetusProtocol: Celebrating $70B+ in total trading volume on #Cetus — built with focus, consistency, and long-term vision. 🎊🐳 From da…

solana's approach to ecosystem building doesn't work because the bigger a project becomes, the stronger their incentive is to leave the chain. This sends the ecosystem to zero in the long term since they will only be able to retain the worst projects colosseum incubated and not the moonshots (Not bullish on pump or any solana projects personally). It's an issue of basic human incentives. Once projects reach a certain scale, they naturally (and very validly) question why they should allow solana to capture and monetize their orderflow through priority fees when they could retain that value themselves. Another big problem is when a project relies on a counterparty (solana) that doesn't even have MCL live to ship their own products. This is extra execution risk that isn't even in your control (bearish solana, no project wants this) An extra problem with building on solana is that your token's TAM is constrained by solana's token market fit (This probably won't be the case in a couple years, but now it's pretty much a thing). This is not looking good for most smartcontract platform's. Performance, which I guess is their main selling point, is just a commodity now. Why tunnel vision building only on solana as a serious builder? The lifestyle of a colosseum project should be something like the following: Get incubated -> Bullish stage, everyone's happy here because the relationship is quite symbiotic. Project's need to raise and solana needs ecosystem projects to raise to make it look like they're succeeding. Both parties benefit Projects start building their own relationships in the industry and realize that they might not need Solana. Some of these projects, especially the ones that have gained traction with investors, will realize that if they build on Solana, they'll always be capped by the success of the chain's token in a way and face extra execution risk. If the chain does badly, they'll do badly Bad projects that have no momo w/o solana will just remain on solana, so the chain experience won't be particularly interesting. They'll just retain the 'worst' projects It's quite funny because it very much mirrors Solana's evolution. Solana was in bed with FTX, which is stain on the industry but they've slowly pivoted away from this association. You can also see this phenomenon on web2 incubators. The more a product is successful, the less important it is if it's a YC company or not. Same thing applies for solana. No serious entrepreneur wants someone else to capture significant upside on their project unless they get something very tangible in return. I guess for Solana this is early stage support, which works if they were an incubator but doesn't really work if they're a blockchain with a token solana is the next scroll, DeGods won't be the only project to leave (Mosi is just bearish integrated chains don't take it personally everyone)

How True Visionaries Rewrite the Rules of Society.. A standard is nothing more than a collective perception, an agreed-upon understanding of an object and the process required to obtain it. That object can be anything your senses can grasp within their current worldview. It could be money, respect, career milestones, body image, even spiritual behavior. As human beings, we are born into a world where standards already exist. We are shaped by them before we can question them. Some standards are rooted in selfless ideals. Many others are driven by the quiet pursuit of control, designed by individuals or systems to preserve a flow of superiority. That superiority often translates into wealth, status, influence, or relevance. This is true not only in financial systems but in education, fashion, morality, and even activism. Most people follow these standards not because they understand them, but because the cost of nonconformity seems too high. The fear of isolation often overrides the will to think. There are rare exceptions. New standards sometimes emerge from selfless intent. These are not forced onto people but offered as possibilities. Consider Bitcoin. It is a decentralized standard that no central figure directly profits from, yet it still changed the world. When a standard like that appears, it is not driven by identity, fame, or extraction. It is driven by vision. It is built for the greater good. At any moment in your life, you have the power to pause and question the standard you are following. Most people inherit their standards from the collective they were born into, never realizing they had a choice. But when you start to question, a crack forms in the mental conditioning that locked you inside the echo chamber. Through that crack, light enters. You begin to see what was missing. You notice contradictions. You feel the weight of unconscious agreements you never consented to. And if you have the courage to step outside that chamber, something changes. You start imagining what a better standard could look like. This is not rebellion for the sake of being different but a reimagination grounded in clarity. You are no longer trying to destroy the old standard. You are trying to upgrade it. You are trying to align it with a worldview that has expanded. But this is where it gets difficult. The more your worldview expands, the harder it becomes to be understood. You might see what others cannot, but you cannot make them see it simply by pointing it out. Establishing a new standard takes more than intelligence. It requires resilience. You must face resistance without becoming reactive. You must explain without preaching. And most of all, you must embody what you propose. Preaching a new worldview means nothing if you do not live it with integrity. If the standard does not shape your behavior, your choices, and your relationships, it remains an idea, not a force. And yes, creating a new standard comes with cost. Loneliness. Misunderstanding. Misinterpretation. People will label you arrogant, rebellious, or even lost. That is the emotional tax of pushing human perception forward. New standards are fragile. They are often co-opted, diluted, or misused by the very systems they aimed to reform. If you are not careful, what you create for liberation may be turned into another tool for control. But if you stay steady, if you remain grounded in clarity, led by values, and patient with those who do not yet understand, you carve a path. A path that others will one day walk not because you told them to, but because they feel the truth of it in how you live. This is how you shift collective perception. Not by shouting louder but by walking differently. You create a new standard. And you live it until it no longer needs your name attached to it.

🇳🇿🇺🇸 ANTARCTIC NIGHT RESCUE: NEW ZEALAND EVACUATES THREE FROM U.S. BASE Total darkness. Minus 24 degrees Celsius. A 20-hour mission across the most unforgiving terrain on Earth. New Zealand’s air force pulled off a high risk evacuation from the US McMurdo Station in Antarctica, rescuing one person in urgent need of medical care and two others. The operation required landing on ice using night vision goggles in unpredictable winter storms. The plane touched down safely in Christchurch. The US hailed the Kiwis’ flawless performance in a region where failure means death. Source: Reuters

RT @iseemonei: STREAM RIGHT NOW JOIN INVITING PUMPFUN STREAMER TO TALK ABOUT THEM AND THEIR VISION